Consistency in decision-making between survey teams and the decision-making body in a professional education program accrediting agency
Credibility of an education program accreditor is dependent on consistency in decision-making among program reviews. The use of peer-review accreditation survey teams is a potential source of inconsistency in the review of individual programs, especially so when the agency employs non-prescriptive a...
Main Author: | Robert Hash |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
2019-05-01
|
Series: | MedEdPublish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/2433 |
Similar Items
-
The attitude of health care professionals towards accreditation: A systematic review of the literature
by: Abdullah Alkhenizan, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Enhancing University Accreditation Process
by: N. Benmoussa, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
The relationship of the NCATE standards to the accreditation decision
by: Roland, Edgar Allen
Published: (2014) -
AHP-Group Decision Making Based on Consistency
by: Juan Aguarón, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
ROENTGENOLOGY ON THE VERGE OF PRIMARY PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITATION
by: L. A. Nizovtsova, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)