Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database

Abstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuefei Wang, Junjie Zhao, Mark Fairweather, Tingsong Yang, Yihong Sun, Jiping Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3
id doaj-d236575f07fd4d4085e4c025b64b6b1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d236575f07fd4d4085e4c025b64b6b1d2020-11-25T04:07:37ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072019-11-0119111010.1186/s12885-019-6166-3Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer DatabaseXuefei Wang0Junjie Zhao1Mark Fairweather2Tingsong Yang3Yihong Sun4Jiping Wang5Gastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityGastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji UniversityGastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalAbstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Methods Octogenarians (≥80 years) with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma who were recommended for surgery were identified from National Cancer Database during 2004–2013. Results Patients age ≥ 80 years with PGC were less likely to be recommended or eventually undergo surgery compared to younger patients. Patients with surgery had a significantly better survival than those without surgery (5-year OS: 26% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), especially in early stage patients. However, additional chemotherapy (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82–1.08, P = 0.36) or radiotherapy (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84–1.13, P = 0.72) had limited benefits. On multivariate analysis, surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002) was a significant independent prognostic factor, while extensive surgery had no survival benefit (Combined organ resection: HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.22–2.91, P = 0.004; number of lymph nodes examined: HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.00, P = 0.10). Surgery performed at academic and research (AR) medical center had the best survival outcome (5-year OS: 30% in AR vs. 18–27% in other programs, P < 0.001) and lowest risk (30-day mortality: 1.5% in AR vs. 3.6–6.6% in other programs, P < 0.001; 90-day mortality: 6.2% in AR vs. 13.6–16.4% in other programs, P < 0.001) compared to other facilities. Conclusions Less-invasive approach performed at academic and research medical center might be the optimal treatment for elderly patients aged ≥80 yrs. with early stage resectable PGC.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3Proximal gastric carcinomaElderlySurgeryTreatmentNational Cancer Database
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xuefei Wang
Junjie Zhao
Mark Fairweather
Tingsong Yang
Yihong Sun
Jiping Wang
spellingShingle Xuefei Wang
Junjie Zhao
Mark Fairweather
Tingsong Yang
Yihong Sun
Jiping Wang
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
BMC Cancer
Proximal gastric carcinoma
Elderly
Surgery
Treatment
National Cancer Database
author_facet Xuefei Wang
Junjie Zhao
Mark Fairweather
Tingsong Yang
Yihong Sun
Jiping Wang
author_sort Xuefei Wang
title Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
title_short Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
title_full Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
title_fullStr Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
title_full_unstemmed Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
title_sort optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on national cancer database
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Methods Octogenarians (≥80 years) with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma who were recommended for surgery were identified from National Cancer Database during 2004–2013. Results Patients age ≥ 80 years with PGC were less likely to be recommended or eventually undergo surgery compared to younger patients. Patients with surgery had a significantly better survival than those without surgery (5-year OS: 26% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), especially in early stage patients. However, additional chemotherapy (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82–1.08, P = 0.36) or radiotherapy (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84–1.13, P = 0.72) had limited benefits. On multivariate analysis, surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002) was a significant independent prognostic factor, while extensive surgery had no survival benefit (Combined organ resection: HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.22–2.91, P = 0.004; number of lymph nodes examined: HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.00, P = 0.10). Surgery performed at academic and research (AR) medical center had the best survival outcome (5-year OS: 30% in AR vs. 18–27% in other programs, P < 0.001) and lowest risk (30-day mortality: 1.5% in AR vs. 3.6–6.6% in other programs, P < 0.001; 90-day mortality: 6.2% in AR vs. 13.6–16.4% in other programs, P < 0.001) compared to other facilities. Conclusions Less-invasive approach performed at academic and research medical center might be the optimal treatment for elderly patients aged ≥80 yrs. with early stage resectable PGC.
topic Proximal gastric carcinoma
Elderly
Surgery
Treatment
National Cancer Database
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3
work_keys_str_mv AT xuefeiwang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
AT junjiezhao optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
AT markfairweather optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
AT tingsongyang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
AT yihongsun optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
AT jipingwang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase
_version_ 1724428148563509248