Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database
Abstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Meth...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3 |
id |
doaj-d236575f07fd4d4085e4c025b64b6b1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d236575f07fd4d4085e4c025b64b6b1d2020-11-25T04:07:37ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072019-11-0119111010.1186/s12885-019-6166-3Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer DatabaseXuefei Wang0Junjie Zhao1Mark Fairweather2Tingsong Yang3Yihong Sun4Jiping Wang5Gastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityGastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji UniversityGastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalAbstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Methods Octogenarians (≥80 years) with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma who were recommended for surgery were identified from National Cancer Database during 2004–2013. Results Patients age ≥ 80 years with PGC were less likely to be recommended or eventually undergo surgery compared to younger patients. Patients with surgery had a significantly better survival than those without surgery (5-year OS: 26% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), especially in early stage patients. However, additional chemotherapy (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82–1.08, P = 0.36) or radiotherapy (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84–1.13, P = 0.72) had limited benefits. On multivariate analysis, surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002) was a significant independent prognostic factor, while extensive surgery had no survival benefit (Combined organ resection: HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.22–2.91, P = 0.004; number of lymph nodes examined: HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.00, P = 0.10). Surgery performed at academic and research (AR) medical center had the best survival outcome (5-year OS: 30% in AR vs. 18–27% in other programs, P < 0.001) and lowest risk (30-day mortality: 1.5% in AR vs. 3.6–6.6% in other programs, P < 0.001; 90-day mortality: 6.2% in AR vs. 13.6–16.4% in other programs, P < 0.001) compared to other facilities. Conclusions Less-invasive approach performed at academic and research medical center might be the optimal treatment for elderly patients aged ≥80 yrs. with early stage resectable PGC.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3Proximal gastric carcinomaElderlySurgeryTreatmentNational Cancer Database |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xuefei Wang Junjie Zhao Mark Fairweather Tingsong Yang Yihong Sun Jiping Wang |
spellingShingle |
Xuefei Wang Junjie Zhao Mark Fairweather Tingsong Yang Yihong Sun Jiping Wang Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database BMC Cancer Proximal gastric carcinoma Elderly Surgery Treatment National Cancer Database |
author_facet |
Xuefei Wang Junjie Zhao Mark Fairweather Tingsong Yang Yihong Sun Jiping Wang |
author_sort |
Xuefei Wang |
title |
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database |
title_short |
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database |
title_full |
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database |
title_fullStr |
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on National Cancer Database |
title_sort |
optimal treatment for elderly patients with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma: a real world study based on national cancer database |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background High perioperative morbidity, mortality, and uncertain outcome of surgery in octogenarians with proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) pose a dilemma for both patients and physicians. We aim to evaluate the risks and survival benefits of different strategies treated in this group. Methods Octogenarians (≥80 years) with resectable proximal gastric carcinoma who were recommended for surgery were identified from National Cancer Database during 2004–2013. Results Patients age ≥ 80 years with PGC were less likely to be recommended or eventually undergo surgery compared to younger patients. Patients with surgery had a significantly better survival than those without surgery (5-year OS: 26% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), especially in early stage patients. However, additional chemotherapy (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82–1.08, P = 0.36) or radiotherapy (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84–1.13, P = 0.72) had limited benefits. On multivariate analysis, surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002) was a significant independent prognostic factor, while extensive surgery had no survival benefit (Combined organ resection: HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.22–2.91, P = 0.004; number of lymph nodes examined: HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.00, P = 0.10). Surgery performed at academic and research (AR) medical center had the best survival outcome (5-year OS: 30% in AR vs. 18–27% in other programs, P < 0.001) and lowest risk (30-day mortality: 1.5% in AR vs. 3.6–6.6% in other programs, P < 0.001; 90-day mortality: 6.2% in AR vs. 13.6–16.4% in other programs, P < 0.001) compared to other facilities. Conclusions Less-invasive approach performed at academic and research medical center might be the optimal treatment for elderly patients aged ≥80 yrs. with early stage resectable PGC. |
topic |
Proximal gastric carcinoma Elderly Surgery Treatment National Cancer Database |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-019-6166-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xuefeiwang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase AT junjiezhao optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase AT markfairweather optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase AT tingsongyang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase AT yihongsun optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase AT jipingwang optimaltreatmentforelderlypatientswithresectableproximalgastriccarcinomaarealworldstudybasedonnationalcancerdatabase |
_version_ |
1724428148563509248 |