Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance

When identifying and comparing forecasting models, there may be a risk that poorly selected criteria could lead to wrong conclusions. Thus, it is important to know how sensitive the results are to the selection of criteria. This contribution aims to study the sensitivity of the identification and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pekka Koponen, Jussi Ikäheimo, Juha Koskela, Christina Brester, Harri Niska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2054
id doaj-d22e75cf791b4e678a346ce8b5eacdfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d22e75cf791b4e678a346ce8b5eacdfc2020-11-25T02:15:56ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-04-01132054205410.3390/en13082054Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting PerformancePekka Koponen0Jussi Ikäheimo1Juha Koskela2Christina Brester3Harri Niska4VTT, Technical research Centre of Finland, Smart Energy and Built Environment, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland, FinlandVTT, Technical research Centre of Finland, Smart Energy and Built Environment, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland, FinlandDept. of Electrical Engineering, Tampere University, P.O. Box 1001, FI-33014 Tampere, FinlandDept. of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, FinlandDept. of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, FinlandWhen identifying and comparing forecasting models, there may be a risk that poorly selected criteria could lead to wrong conclusions. Thus, it is important to know how sensitive the results are to the selection of criteria. This contribution aims to study the sensitivity of the identification and comparison results to the choice of criteria. It compares typically applied criteria for tuning and performance assessment of load forecasting methods with estimated costs caused by the forecasting errors. The focus is on short-term forecasting of the loads of energy systems. The estimated costs comprise electricity market costs and network costs. We estimate the electricity market costs by assuming that the forecasting errors cause balancing errors and consequently balancing costs to the market actors. The forecasting errors cause network costs by overloading network components thus increasing losses and reducing the component lifetime or alternatively increase operational margins to avoid those overloads. The lifetime loss of insulators, and thus also the components, is caused by heating according to the law of Arrhenius. We also study consumer costs. The results support the assumption that there is a need to develop and use additional and case-specific performance criteria for electricity load forecasting.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2054short term load forecastingperformance criteriapower systemscost analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pekka Koponen
Jussi Ikäheimo
Juha Koskela
Christina Brester
Harri Niska
spellingShingle Pekka Koponen
Jussi Ikäheimo
Juha Koskela
Christina Brester
Harri Niska
Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
Energies
short term load forecasting
performance criteria
power systems
cost analysis
author_facet Pekka Koponen
Jussi Ikäheimo
Juha Koskela
Christina Brester
Harri Niska
author_sort Pekka Koponen
title Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
title_short Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
title_full Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
title_fullStr Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and Comparing Short Term Load Forecasting Performance
title_sort assessing and comparing short term load forecasting performance
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-04-01
description When identifying and comparing forecasting models, there may be a risk that poorly selected criteria could lead to wrong conclusions. Thus, it is important to know how sensitive the results are to the selection of criteria. This contribution aims to study the sensitivity of the identification and comparison results to the choice of criteria. It compares typically applied criteria for tuning and performance assessment of load forecasting methods with estimated costs caused by the forecasting errors. The focus is on short-term forecasting of the loads of energy systems. The estimated costs comprise electricity market costs and network costs. We estimate the electricity market costs by assuming that the forecasting errors cause balancing errors and consequently balancing costs to the market actors. The forecasting errors cause network costs by overloading network components thus increasing losses and reducing the component lifetime or alternatively increase operational margins to avoid those overloads. The lifetime loss of insulators, and thus also the components, is caused by heating according to the law of Arrhenius. We also study consumer costs. The results support the assumption that there is a need to develop and use additional and case-specific performance criteria for electricity load forecasting.
topic short term load forecasting
performance criteria
power systems
cost analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/8/2054
work_keys_str_mv AT pekkakoponen assessingandcomparingshorttermloadforecastingperformance
AT jussiikaheimo assessingandcomparingshorttermloadforecastingperformance
AT juhakoskela assessingandcomparingshorttermloadforecastingperformance
AT christinabrester assessingandcomparingshorttermloadforecastingperformance
AT harriniska assessingandcomparingshorttermloadforecastingperformance
_version_ 1724893911551311872