Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation

The third part of Gurdjieff’s trilogy All and Everything has not been studied sufficiently or earned any considerable attention by scholars. Its structure seems rather incoherent and circumstantial and its overall message diffused and centerless. However, in the last book Gurdjieff illustrates meton...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vrasidas Karalis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aren Roukema 2020-12-01
Series:Correspondences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://correspondencesjournal.com/ojs/ojs/index.php/home/article/download/112/112
id doaj-d22941e3254944abb0a2c98be70a73f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d22941e3254944abb0a2c98be70a73f62021-03-28T19:04:30ZengAren RoukemaCorrespondences2053-71582020-12-0182255280101Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of IndividuationVrasidas KaralisThe third part of Gurdjieff’s trilogy All and Everything has not been studied sufficiently or earned any considerable attention by scholars. Its structure seems rather incoherent and circumstantial and its overall message diffused and centerless. However, in the last book Gurdjieff illustrates metonymically the transition from self-consciousness to what he called objective knowledge, a cogitation on the self and the world around it without any psychological projections or emotional transferences. An analogous approach to the question of the personal and collective identities can be found in C.G. Jung’s principle of individuation according to which the individual has to not only appropriate the collective myths of its society but also to see them “objectively” which means as “social objects.” The present paper discusses the process of psychological projection as advocated by Jung—in order to individuate collective representations and experience the objectivity of the real—while delineating Gurdjieff’s response to one of the central principles of depth psychology. Can we individuate reality and yet see it without our own projections? Gurdjieff’s answer is more practical than Jung’s but raises complex questions about the ability of human consciousness to reach beyond its own cognitive limitations. Although Gurdjieff’s last book remained unfinished, certain challenging insights into the meaning of “a veritable, nonfantastic representation of the world as it is” are elaborated by P.D. Ouspensky’s The Psychology of Man’s Possible Evolution (1950) which essentially attempts to construct a Gurdjieffian theory of the psyche.https://correspondencesjournal.com/ojs/ojs/index.php/home/article/download/112/112g. i. gurdjieffc. g. jungindividuationlife is real only then, when ‘i am’objectivitypsychoanalysispsychosynthesisp.d. ouspenskyself-consciousnessobjective consciousness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vrasidas Karalis
spellingShingle Vrasidas Karalis
Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
Correspondences
g. i. gurdjieff
c. g. jung
individuation
life is real only then, when ‘i am’
objectivity
psychoanalysis
psychosynthesis
p.d. ouspensky
self-consciousness
objective consciousness
author_facet Vrasidas Karalis
author_sort Vrasidas Karalis
title Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
title_short Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
title_full Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
title_fullStr Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
title_full_unstemmed Gurdjieff and C. G. Jung: Life Is Real Only Then, When ‘I Am’ and the Question of Individuation
title_sort gurdjieff and c. g. jung: life is real only then, when ‘i am’ and the question of individuation
publisher Aren Roukema
series Correspondences
issn 2053-7158
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The third part of Gurdjieff’s trilogy All and Everything has not been studied sufficiently or earned any considerable attention by scholars. Its structure seems rather incoherent and circumstantial and its overall message diffused and centerless. However, in the last book Gurdjieff illustrates metonymically the transition from self-consciousness to what he called objective knowledge, a cogitation on the self and the world around it without any psychological projections or emotional transferences. An analogous approach to the question of the personal and collective identities can be found in C.G. Jung’s principle of individuation according to which the individual has to not only appropriate the collective myths of its society but also to see them “objectively” which means as “social objects.” The present paper discusses the process of psychological projection as advocated by Jung—in order to individuate collective representations and experience the objectivity of the real—while delineating Gurdjieff’s response to one of the central principles of depth psychology. Can we individuate reality and yet see it without our own projections? Gurdjieff’s answer is more practical than Jung’s but raises complex questions about the ability of human consciousness to reach beyond its own cognitive limitations. Although Gurdjieff’s last book remained unfinished, certain challenging insights into the meaning of “a veritable, nonfantastic representation of the world as it is” are elaborated by P.D. Ouspensky’s The Psychology of Man’s Possible Evolution (1950) which essentially attempts to construct a Gurdjieffian theory of the psyche.
topic g. i. gurdjieff
c. g. jung
individuation
life is real only then, when ‘i am’
objectivity
psychoanalysis
psychosynthesis
p.d. ouspensky
self-consciousness
objective consciousness
url https://correspondencesjournal.com/ojs/ojs/index.php/home/article/download/112/112
work_keys_str_mv AT vrasidaskaralis gurdjieffandcgjunglifeisrealonlythenwheniamandthequestionofindividuation
_version_ 1724199548603072512