Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey
Abstract Aim To psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity. Design This study was a secondary data analysis. Method Data collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) s...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Nursing Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.346 |
id |
doaj-d2283eea11eb4797b8df62aff33e9173 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d2283eea11eb4797b8df62aff33e91732020-11-25T01:18:12ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582019-10-01641404141310.1002/nop2.346Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice surveyAlexandra Plavskin0William E. Samuels1Kathleen A. Calzone2Hunter College New York New YorkCollege of Staten Island CUNY Staten Island New YorkCenter for Cancer Research National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Bethesda MarylandAbstract Aim To psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity. Design This study was a secondary data analysis. Method Data collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) study were used to evaluate the GGNPS for evidence of construct validity via structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. Face validity was evaluated via feedback from practicing RNs without specific experience with or knowledge of genetics/genomics. Content validity was evaluated via content expert feedback and assessment of a content validity index. Results The thresholds for evidence of content and face validity were met. However, we found less evidence for construct validity of the GGNPS; an exploratory factor analysis, conducted to gain additional insight into the theorized latent constructs, determined that the variables were more interrelated that previously predicted.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.346geneticsgenomicsinstrument developmentstatistical modelling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexandra Plavskin William E. Samuels Kathleen A. Calzone |
spellingShingle |
Alexandra Plavskin William E. Samuels Kathleen A. Calzone Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey Nursing Open genetics genomics instrument development statistical modelling |
author_facet |
Alexandra Plavskin William E. Samuels Kathleen A. Calzone |
author_sort |
Alexandra Plavskin |
title |
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
title_short |
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
title_full |
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
title_fullStr |
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
title_sort |
validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Nursing Open |
issn |
2054-1058 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim To psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity. Design This study was a secondary data analysis. Method Data collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) study were used to evaluate the GGNPS for evidence of construct validity via structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. Face validity was evaluated via feedback from practicing RNs without specific experience with or knowledge of genetics/genomics. Content validity was evaluated via content expert feedback and assessment of a content validity index. Results The thresholds for evidence of content and face validity were met. However, we found less evidence for construct validity of the GGNPS; an exploratory factor analysis, conducted to gain additional insight into the theorized latent constructs, determined that the variables were more interrelated that previously predicted. |
topic |
genetics genomics instrument development statistical modelling |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.346 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandraplavskin validityevaluationofthegeneticsandgenomicsinnursingpracticesurvey AT williamesamuels validityevaluationofthegeneticsandgenomicsinnursingpracticesurvey AT kathleenacalzone validityevaluationofthegeneticsandgenomicsinnursingpracticesurvey |
_version_ |
1725143159224139776 |