Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress

The main argument of this paper is that the heterogeneity of the institutional framework that prevails in Latin America’s electoral field (Carroll y Shugart, 2005), also reproduces itself in the parliamentary one. This is proved by the morphologic profile of each Congress’ commission system and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luisa BÉJAR
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 2009-04-01
Series:América Latina Hoy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/1369
id doaj-d2000a0d0ab54da0adf40ed912367e4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d2000a0d0ab54da0adf40ed912367e4c2020-11-25T03:48:28ZspaEdiciones Universidad de SalamancaAmérica Latina Hoy1130-28872340-43962009-04-0147010.14201/alh.13691351Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in CongressLuisa BÉJARThe main argument of this paper is that the heterogeneity of the institutional framework that prevails in Latin America’s electoral field (Carroll y Shugart, 2005), also reproduces itself in the parliamentary one. This is proved by the morphologic profile of each Congress’ commission system and the place that the law assigns to the system. While some legislative frameworks clearly intend to delegate to parties the decisions entrusted to this bodies; in other cases, this takes place in a less important way. In the cases formally related with a party logic, on the other hand, diverse delegation schemes are encouraged. In this article we analyze the institutional framework of the commission systems of the low chamber in: Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Colombia; Chile; Mexico; Paraguay; Dominican Republic and Uruguay. In this sense, this work examines the importance given to their job and some aspects of its morphology that affect the structure of incentives that narrows the development of the legislative process. We also analyze the procedures used by each Congress to solve its problems of collective action. Lastly, some ideas for the elaboration of a future taxonomy on the relationship between parties and permanent commissions in the region are presented.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/1369congresocomisionesamérica latinaproceso legislativopartidos políticos
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luisa BÉJAR
spellingShingle Luisa BÉJAR
Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
América Latina Hoy
congreso
comisiones
américa latina
proceso legislativo
partidos políticos
author_facet Luisa BÉJAR
author_sort Luisa BÉJAR
title Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
title_short Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
title_full Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
title_fullStr Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
title_full_unstemmed Parliament representation in Latin America. The permanent commissions and the parties in Congress
title_sort parliament representation in latin america. the permanent commissions and the parties in congress
publisher Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
series América Latina Hoy
issn 1130-2887
2340-4396
publishDate 2009-04-01
description The main argument of this paper is that the heterogeneity of the institutional framework that prevails in Latin America’s electoral field (Carroll y Shugart, 2005), also reproduces itself in the parliamentary one. This is proved by the morphologic profile of each Congress’ commission system and the place that the law assigns to the system. While some legislative frameworks clearly intend to delegate to parties the decisions entrusted to this bodies; in other cases, this takes place in a less important way. In the cases formally related with a party logic, on the other hand, diverse delegation schemes are encouraged. In this article we analyze the institutional framework of the commission systems of the low chamber in: Argentina; Bolivia; Brazil; Colombia; Chile; Mexico; Paraguay; Dominican Republic and Uruguay. In this sense, this work examines the importance given to their job and some aspects of its morphology that affect the structure of incentives that narrows the development of the legislative process. We also analyze the procedures used by each Congress to solve its problems of collective action. Lastly, some ideas for the elaboration of a future taxonomy on the relationship between parties and permanent commissions in the region are presented.
topic congreso
comisiones
américa latina
proceso legislativo
partidos políticos
url https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/1369
work_keys_str_mv AT luisabejar parliamentrepresentationinlatinamericathepermanentcommissionsandthepartiesincongress
_version_ 1724498919139835904