Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iter...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715 |
id |
doaj-d1e422e83ca148fc9ec97574898d1557 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d1e422e83ca148fc9ec97574898d15572021-07-15T15:41:07ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-07-01143715371510.3390/ma14133715Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting PartsTobias Rosnitschek0Maximilian Erber1Christoph Hartmann2Wolfram Volk3Frank Rieg4Stephan Tremmel5Engineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyEngineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyEngineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyThe structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715die castingimplicit modelingprocess assurancestructural optimizationvirtual product development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tobias Rosnitschek Maximilian Erber Christoph Hartmann Wolfram Volk Frank Rieg Stephan Tremmel |
spellingShingle |
Tobias Rosnitschek Maximilian Erber Christoph Hartmann Wolfram Volk Frank Rieg Stephan Tremmel Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts Materials die casting implicit modeling process assurance structural optimization virtual product development |
author_facet |
Tobias Rosnitschek Maximilian Erber Christoph Hartmann Wolfram Volk Frank Rieg Stephan Tremmel |
author_sort |
Tobias Rosnitschek |
title |
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_short |
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_full |
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_fullStr |
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts |
title_sort |
combining structural optimization and process assurance in implicit modelling for casting parts |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Materials |
issn |
1996-1944 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times. |
topic |
die casting implicit modeling process assurance structural optimization virtual product development |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tobiasrosnitschek combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT maximilianerber combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT christophhartmann combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT wolframvolk combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT frankrieg combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts AT stephantremmel combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts |
_version_ |
1721299033045073920 |