Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts

The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias Rosnitschek, Maximilian Erber, Christoph Hartmann, Wolfram Volk, Frank Rieg, Stephan Tremmel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715
id doaj-d1e422e83ca148fc9ec97574898d1557
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1e422e83ca148fc9ec97574898d15572021-07-15T15:41:07ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-07-01143715371510.3390/ma14133715Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting PartsTobias Rosnitschek0Maximilian Erber1Christoph Hartmann2Wolfram Volk3Frank Rieg4Stephan Tremmel5Engineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyMetal Forming and Casting, Technical University of Munich, Walther-Meißner-Straße 4, 85748 Garching, GermanyEngineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyEngineering Design and CAD, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyThe structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715die castingimplicit modelingprocess assurancestructural optimizationvirtual product development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tobias Rosnitschek
Maximilian Erber
Christoph Hartmann
Wolfram Volk
Frank Rieg
Stephan Tremmel
spellingShingle Tobias Rosnitschek
Maximilian Erber
Christoph Hartmann
Wolfram Volk
Frank Rieg
Stephan Tremmel
Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
Materials
die casting
implicit modeling
process assurance
structural optimization
virtual product development
author_facet Tobias Rosnitschek
Maximilian Erber
Christoph Hartmann
Wolfram Volk
Frank Rieg
Stephan Tremmel
author_sort Tobias Rosnitschek
title Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_short Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_full Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_fullStr Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_full_unstemmed Combining Structural Optimization and Process Assurance in Implicit Modelling for Casting Parts
title_sort combining structural optimization and process assurance in implicit modelling for casting parts
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The structural optimization of manufacturable casting parts is still a challenging and time-consuming task. Today, topology optimization is followed by a manual reconstruction of the design proposal and a process assurance simulation to endorse the design proposal. Consequently, this process is iteratively repeated until it reaches a satisfying compromise. This article shows a method to combine structural optimization and process assurance results to generate automatically structure- and process-optimized die casting parts using implicit geometry modeling. Therefore, evaluation criteria are developed to evaluate the current design proposal and qualitatively measure the improvement of manufacturability between two iterations. For testing the proposed method, we use a cantilever beam as an example of proof. The combined iterative method is compared to manual designed parts and a direct optimization approach and evaluated for mechanical performance and manufacturability. The combination of topology optimization (TO) and process assurance (PA) results is automated and shows a significant enhancement to the manual reconstruction of the design proposals. Further, the improvement of manufacturability is better or equivalent to previous work in the field while using less computational effort, which emphasizes the need for suitable metamodels to significantly reduce the effort for process assurance and enable much shorter iteration times.
topic die casting
implicit modeling
process assurance
structural optimization
virtual product development
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/13/3715
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasrosnitschek combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT maximilianerber combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT christophhartmann combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT wolframvolk combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT frankrieg combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
AT stephantremmel combiningstructuraloptimizationandprocessassuranceinimplicitmodellingforcastingparts
_version_ 1721299033045073920