An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport

Abstract Regulatory efforts to introduce effective intramodal competition to the rail sector, in particular to the long-distance intercity market segment, have so far achieved only very limited success in most countries. Germany is a case in point. Even 25 years after the fundamental 1994 ‘rail stru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Eisenkopf, Andreas Knorr
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Springer 2021-06-01
Series:Wirtschaftsdienst
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2939-9
id doaj-d1e07f1ea226479e990bc4fd75feeeb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1e07f1ea226479e990bc4fd75feeeb62021-06-27T11:21:27ZdeuSpringerWirtschaftsdienst0043-62751613-978X2021-06-01101644645310.1007/s10273-021-2939-9An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail TransportAlexander Eisenkopf0Andreas Knorr1Zeppelin-LS f. Wirtschafts- u. Verkehrspolitik, Zeppelin Universität FriedrichshafenVerwaltungswissenschaften Speyer, Deutsche Universität fürAbstract Regulatory efforts to introduce effective intramodal competition to the rail sector, in particular to the long-distance intercity market segment, have so far achieved only very limited success in most countries. Germany is a case in point. Even 25 years after the fundamental 1994 ‘rail structure reform’, which eliminated the legal network monopoly of the former Deutsche Bundesbahn (DB), the combined market share of all competitors for long-distance passenger services remains stuck at “significantly below one per cent” (Bundesnetzagentur 2018, 22). This figure stands in stark contrast to the competitors’ market shares of some 26% for short-distance (regional) services — where a competition for the market regime has been established — and around 50% of the rail cargo segment — which is governed by an open access regime. In this paper, we make the case for an alternative regulatory regime to substantially increase effective intramodal competition in the intercity rail passenger market. Our proposal addresses, and helps to overcome, the two major entry barriers faced by competitors: the massive investment needs in rolling stock on the one hand and reliable infrastructure access on the other.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2939-9
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Eisenkopf
Andreas Knorr
spellingShingle Alexander Eisenkopf
Andreas Knorr
An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
Wirtschaftsdienst
author_facet Alexander Eisenkopf
Andreas Knorr
author_sort Alexander Eisenkopf
title An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
title_short An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
title_full An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
title_fullStr An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
title_full_unstemmed An Innovative Regulatory Approach to Stimulate Competition in Long-Distance Passenger Rail Transport
title_sort innovative regulatory approach to stimulate competition in long-distance passenger rail transport
publisher Springer
series Wirtschaftsdienst
issn 0043-6275
1613-978X
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Regulatory efforts to introduce effective intramodal competition to the rail sector, in particular to the long-distance intercity market segment, have so far achieved only very limited success in most countries. Germany is a case in point. Even 25 years after the fundamental 1994 ‘rail structure reform’, which eliminated the legal network monopoly of the former Deutsche Bundesbahn (DB), the combined market share of all competitors for long-distance passenger services remains stuck at “significantly below one per cent” (Bundesnetzagentur 2018, 22). This figure stands in stark contrast to the competitors’ market shares of some 26% for short-distance (regional) services — where a competition for the market regime has been established — and around 50% of the rail cargo segment — which is governed by an open access regime. In this paper, we make the case for an alternative regulatory regime to substantially increase effective intramodal competition in the intercity rail passenger market. Our proposal addresses, and helps to overcome, the two major entry barriers faced by competitors: the massive investment needs in rolling stock on the one hand and reliable infrastructure access on the other.
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2939-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandereisenkopf aninnovativeregulatoryapproachtostimulatecompetitioninlongdistancepassengerrailtransport
AT andreasknorr aninnovativeregulatoryapproachtostimulatecompetitioninlongdistancepassengerrailtransport
AT alexandereisenkopf innovativeregulatoryapproachtostimulatecompetitioninlongdistancepassengerrailtransport
AT andreasknorr innovativeregulatoryapproachtostimulatecompetitioninlongdistancepassengerrailtransport
_version_ 1721357938884345856