Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

<h4>Background</h4>Since a previous meta-analysis reported that ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate in catheterization of the radial artery, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent results. The aim of the present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lu Tang, Fei Wang, Yuxiang Li, Liang Zhao, Huijun Xi, Zhihong Guo, Xiuyun Li, Chengjie Gao, Jian Wang, Lingjun Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111527
id doaj-d1dc6e66d5e244f985f16b7f6b0b124a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1dc6e66d5e244f985f16b7f6b0b124a2021-03-04T08:49:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11152710.1371/journal.pone.0111527Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Lu TangFei WangYuxiang LiLiang ZhaoHuijun XiZhihong GuoXiuyun LiChengjie GaoJian WangLingjun Zhou<h4>Background</h4>Since a previous meta-analysis reported that ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate in catheterization of the radial artery, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent results. The aim of the present study is to conduct an updated meta-analysis to clarify the role of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted using specific search terms. Eligible studies were RCTs that compared ultrasound guidance with traditional palpation for radial artery catheterization. The Mantel-Haenszel method using the random effects model was adopted in this meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Seven RCTs with 482 patients were included. Compared with traditional palpation, ultrasound guidance significantly increased the first-attempt success rate of radial artery catheterization (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.14, P = 0.02). Subgroup analyses suggested that the superiority of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization was significant when the technique was operated by experienced users, performed in small children and infants, and on elective procedures in the operating room. In addition, ultrasound guidance significantly reduced mean-attempts to success (WMD -1.13, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.69, P<0.00001), mean-time to success (WMD -74.77s, 95% CI -137.89s to -11.64s, P = 0.02), and the occurrence of hematoma (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.41, P = 0.0001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The present meta-analysis suggests a clear benefit from ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization compared with the traditional palpation. Preliminary training and familiarization with the ultrasound-guided technique is needed before applying it for radial artery catheterization, especially for inexperienced operators.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111527
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lu Tang
Fei Wang
Yuxiang Li
Liang Zhao
Huijun Xi
Zhihong Guo
Xiuyun Li
Chengjie Gao
Jian Wang
Lingjun Zhou
spellingShingle Lu Tang
Fei Wang
Yuxiang Li
Liang Zhao
Huijun Xi
Zhihong Guo
Xiuyun Li
Chengjie Gao
Jian Wang
Lingjun Zhou
Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lu Tang
Fei Wang
Yuxiang Li
Liang Zhao
Huijun Xi
Zhihong Guo
Xiuyun Li
Chengjie Gao
Jian Wang
Lingjun Zhou
author_sort Lu Tang
title Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Since a previous meta-analysis reported that ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate in catheterization of the radial artery, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent results. The aim of the present study is to conduct an updated meta-analysis to clarify the role of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted using specific search terms. Eligible studies were RCTs that compared ultrasound guidance with traditional palpation for radial artery catheterization. The Mantel-Haenszel method using the random effects model was adopted in this meta-analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Seven RCTs with 482 patients were included. Compared with traditional palpation, ultrasound guidance significantly increased the first-attempt success rate of radial artery catheterization (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.14, P = 0.02). Subgroup analyses suggested that the superiority of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization was significant when the technique was operated by experienced users, performed in small children and infants, and on elective procedures in the operating room. In addition, ultrasound guidance significantly reduced mean-attempts to success (WMD -1.13, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.69, P<0.00001), mean-time to success (WMD -74.77s, 95% CI -137.89s to -11.64s, P = 0.02), and the occurrence of hematoma (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.41, P = 0.0001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The present meta-analysis suggests a clear benefit from ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization compared with the traditional palpation. Preliminary training and familiarization with the ultrasound-guided technique is needed before applying it for radial artery catheterization, especially for inexperienced operators.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111527
work_keys_str_mv AT lutang ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT feiwang ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuxiangli ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liangzhao ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huijunxi ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhihongguo ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiuyunli ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chengjiegao ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jianwang ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lingjunzhou ultrasoundguidanceforradialarterycatheterizationanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1714807594240966656