Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Objectives: Superior Vena Cava (SVC) flow in neonates measured by the standard approach has been validated by different groups around the world. The modified SVC flow measurement technique was recently suggested. The aim of our study was to evaluate standard and modified technique of echocardiograph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Miletin, Zbynek Stranak, Niamh Ó Catháin, Jan Janota, Jana Semberova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.661698/full
id doaj-d1d2bfa5353b4e58ad935a2544e623dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1d2bfa5353b4e58ad935a2544e623dd2021-04-07T04:53:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602021-04-01910.3389/fped.2021.661698661698Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort StudyJan Miletin0Jan Miletin1Jan Miletin2Jan Miletin3Zbynek Stranak4Zbynek Stranak5Niamh Ó Catháin6Niamh Ó Catháin7Jan Janota8Jan Janota9Jana Semberova10Jana Semberova11Jana Semberova12Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, IrelandInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, CzechiaUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czechia3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaCoombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, IrelandUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland1st and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaMotol University Hospital, Prague, CzechiaCoombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, IrelandInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, CzechiaUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandObjectives: Superior Vena Cava (SVC) flow in neonates measured by the standard approach has been validated by different groups around the world. The modified SVC flow measurement technique was recently suggested. The aim of our study was to evaluate standard and modified technique of echocardiography SVC flow measurement in a cohort of extremely preterm neonates in the immediate postnatal period.Methods: Prospective, observational cohort study in a level III neonatal center. Infants with birth weight &lt;1,250 g were eligible for enrolment. SVC flow was measured by echocardiography using standard and modified methods at 6, 18 and 36 h of age. Our primary outcome was equivalency (using raw bounds of −20 to +20 mL/kg/min difference between the paired measurements), agreement and correlation between standard and modified methods of the SVC flow measurements.Results: Thirty-nine infants were enrolled. The mean gestational age of the cohort was 27.4 (SD 2.1) weeks of postmenstrual age, the mean birth weight was 0.95 kg (SD 0.2). The measurements at 6 and 36 h of age were equivalent as defined in the design of the study (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004 respectively; raw bounds −20 to +20 mL/kg/min). At 6 h of age the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was −0.8 mL/kg/min with 95% limits of agreement −65.0 to 63.4 mL/kg/min. At 18 h of age, the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was +9.5 mL/kg/min, with 95% limits of agreement −79.6 to 98.7 mL/kg/min. At 36 h of age the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was −2.2 mL/kg/min with 95% limits of agreement −73.4 to 69.1 mL/kg/min. There was a weak, but statistically significant correlation between the standard and modified method at 6 h of age (r = 0.39, p = 0.04).Conclusion: Both SVC flow echocardiography measurement techniques yielded clinically equivalent results, however due to wide limits of agreement and poor correlation they do not seem to be interchangeable.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.661698/fullsuperior vena cavaflowcardiac outputpreterm neonatetechnique
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Zbynek Stranak
Zbynek Stranak
Niamh Ó Catháin
Niamh Ó Catháin
Jan Janota
Jan Janota
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
spellingShingle Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Zbynek Stranak
Zbynek Stranak
Niamh Ó Catháin
Niamh Ó Catháin
Jan Janota
Jan Janota
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Frontiers in Pediatrics
superior vena cava
flow
cardiac output
preterm neonate
technique
author_facet Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Jan Miletin
Zbynek Stranak
Zbynek Stranak
Niamh Ó Catháin
Niamh Ó Catháin
Jan Janota
Jan Janota
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
Jana Semberova
author_sort Jan Miletin
title Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Techniques of Superior Vena Cava Flow Measurement in Preterm Infants With Birth Weight <1,250 g in the Transitional Period—Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of two techniques of superior vena cava flow measurement in preterm infants with birth weight <1,250 g in the transitional period—prospective observational cohort study
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
issn 2296-2360
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Objectives: Superior Vena Cava (SVC) flow in neonates measured by the standard approach has been validated by different groups around the world. The modified SVC flow measurement technique was recently suggested. The aim of our study was to evaluate standard and modified technique of echocardiography SVC flow measurement in a cohort of extremely preterm neonates in the immediate postnatal period.Methods: Prospective, observational cohort study in a level III neonatal center. Infants with birth weight &lt;1,250 g were eligible for enrolment. SVC flow was measured by echocardiography using standard and modified methods at 6, 18 and 36 h of age. Our primary outcome was equivalency (using raw bounds of −20 to +20 mL/kg/min difference between the paired measurements), agreement and correlation between standard and modified methods of the SVC flow measurements.Results: Thirty-nine infants were enrolled. The mean gestational age of the cohort was 27.4 (SD 2.1) weeks of postmenstrual age, the mean birth weight was 0.95 kg (SD 0.2). The measurements at 6 and 36 h of age were equivalent as defined in the design of the study (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004 respectively; raw bounds −20 to +20 mL/kg/min). At 6 h of age the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was −0.8 mL/kg/min with 95% limits of agreement −65.0 to 63.4 mL/kg/min. At 18 h of age, the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was +9.5 mL/kg/min, with 95% limits of agreement −79.6 to 98.7 mL/kg/min. At 36 h of age the mean difference (bias) between the measurements was −2.2 mL/kg/min with 95% limits of agreement −73.4 to 69.1 mL/kg/min. There was a weak, but statistically significant correlation between the standard and modified method at 6 h of age (r = 0.39, p = 0.04).Conclusion: Both SVC flow echocardiography measurement techniques yielded clinically equivalent results, however due to wide limits of agreement and poor correlation they do not seem to be interchangeable.
topic superior vena cava
flow
cardiac output
preterm neonate
technique
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.661698/full
work_keys_str_mv AT janmiletin comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janmiletin comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janmiletin comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janmiletin comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT zbynekstranak comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT zbynekstranak comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT niamhocathain comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT niamhocathain comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janjanota comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janjanota comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janasemberova comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janasemberova comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT janasemberova comparisonoftwotechniquesofsuperiorvenacavaflowmeasurementinpreterminfantswithbirthweight1250ginthetransitionalperiodprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
_version_ 1721536589174145024