HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is rising globally, presenting challenges for optimized clinical management. To date, it remains unclear which biomarker best reflects HPV-driven carcinogenesis, a process that is associated with better therapeutic resp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan Philipp Kühn, Wendelin Schmid, Sandrina Körner, Florian Bochen, Silke Wemmert, Hugo Rimbach, Sigrun Smola, Julia Caroline Radosa, Mathias Wagner, Luc G.T. Morris, Victoria Bozzato, Alessandro Bozzato, Bernhard Schick, Maximilian Linxweiler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
HPV
p16
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/18/4730
id doaj-d1c725b330df4665842698cc04ed489d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1c725b330df4665842698cc04ed489d2021-09-25T23:50:41ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-09-01134730473010.3390/cancers13184730HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?Jan Philipp Kühn0Wendelin Schmid1Sandrina Körner2Florian Bochen3Silke Wemmert4Hugo Rimbach5Sigrun Smola6Julia Caroline Radosa7Mathias Wagner8Luc G.T. Morris9Victoria Bozzato10Alessandro Bozzato11Bernhard Schick12Maximilian Linxweiler13Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyInstitute of Virology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of General and Surgical Pathology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyImmunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USADepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, GermanyThe incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is rising globally, presenting challenges for optimized clinical management. To date, it remains unclear which biomarker best reflects HPV-driven carcinogenesis, a process that is associated with better therapeutic response and outcome compared to tobacco/alcohol-induced cancers. Six potential HPV surrogate biomarkers were analyzed using FFPE tissue samples from 153 HNSCC patients (<i>n</i> = 78 oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), <i>n</i> = 35 laryngeal cancer, <i>n</i> = 23 hypopharyngeal cancer, <i>n</i> = 17 oral cavity cancer): p16, CyclinD1, pRb, dual immunohistochemical staining of p16 and Ki67, HPV-DNA-PCR, and HPV-DNA-in situ hybridization (ISH). Biomarkers were analyzed for correlation with one another, tumor subsite, and patient survival. P16-IHC alone showed the best performance for discriminating between good (high expression) vs poor outcome (low expression; <i>p</i> = 0.0030) in OPSCC patients. Additionally, HPV-DNA-ISH (<i>p</i> = 0.0039), HPV-DNA-PCR (<i>p</i> = 0.0113), and p16-Ki67 dual stain (<i>p</i> = 0.0047) were significantly associated with prognosis in uni- and multivariable analysis for oropharyngeal cancer. In the non-OPSCC group, however, none of the aforementioned surrogate markers was prognostic. Taken together, P16-IHC as a single biomarker displays the best diagnostic accuracy for prognosis stratification in OPSCC patients with a direct detection of HPV-DNA by PCR or ISH as well as p16-Ki67 dual stain as potential alternatives.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/18/4730head and neck cancerHPVprognosisbiomarkerp16
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Philipp Kühn
Wendelin Schmid
Sandrina Körner
Florian Bochen
Silke Wemmert
Hugo Rimbach
Sigrun Smola
Julia Caroline Radosa
Mathias Wagner
Luc G.T. Morris
Victoria Bozzato
Alessandro Bozzato
Bernhard Schick
Maximilian Linxweiler
spellingShingle Jan Philipp Kühn
Wendelin Schmid
Sandrina Körner
Florian Bochen
Silke Wemmert
Hugo Rimbach
Sigrun Smola
Julia Caroline Radosa
Mathias Wagner
Luc G.T. Morris
Victoria Bozzato
Alessandro Bozzato
Bernhard Schick
Maximilian Linxweiler
HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
Cancers
head and neck cancer
HPV
prognosis
biomarker
p16
author_facet Jan Philipp Kühn
Wendelin Schmid
Sandrina Körner
Florian Bochen
Silke Wemmert
Hugo Rimbach
Sigrun Smola
Julia Caroline Radosa
Mathias Wagner
Luc G.T. Morris
Victoria Bozzato
Alessandro Bozzato
Bernhard Schick
Maximilian Linxweiler
author_sort Jan Philipp Kühn
title HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
title_short HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
title_full HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
title_fullStr HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
title_full_unstemmed HPV Status as Prognostic Biomarker in Head and Neck Cancer—Which Method Fits the Best for Outcome Prediction?
title_sort hpv status as prognostic biomarker in head and neck cancer—which method fits the best for outcome prediction?
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is rising globally, presenting challenges for optimized clinical management. To date, it remains unclear which biomarker best reflects HPV-driven carcinogenesis, a process that is associated with better therapeutic response and outcome compared to tobacco/alcohol-induced cancers. Six potential HPV surrogate biomarkers were analyzed using FFPE tissue samples from 153 HNSCC patients (<i>n</i> = 78 oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), <i>n</i> = 35 laryngeal cancer, <i>n</i> = 23 hypopharyngeal cancer, <i>n</i> = 17 oral cavity cancer): p16, CyclinD1, pRb, dual immunohistochemical staining of p16 and Ki67, HPV-DNA-PCR, and HPV-DNA-in situ hybridization (ISH). Biomarkers were analyzed for correlation with one another, tumor subsite, and patient survival. P16-IHC alone showed the best performance for discriminating between good (high expression) vs poor outcome (low expression; <i>p</i> = 0.0030) in OPSCC patients. Additionally, HPV-DNA-ISH (<i>p</i> = 0.0039), HPV-DNA-PCR (<i>p</i> = 0.0113), and p16-Ki67 dual stain (<i>p</i> = 0.0047) were significantly associated with prognosis in uni- and multivariable analysis for oropharyngeal cancer. In the non-OPSCC group, however, none of the aforementioned surrogate markers was prognostic. Taken together, P16-IHC as a single biomarker displays the best diagnostic accuracy for prognosis stratification in OPSCC patients with a direct detection of HPV-DNA by PCR or ISH as well as p16-Ki67 dual stain as potential alternatives.
topic head and neck cancer
HPV
prognosis
biomarker
p16
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/18/4730
work_keys_str_mv AT janphilippkuhn hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT wendelinschmid hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT sandrinakorner hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT florianbochen hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT silkewemmert hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT hugorimbach hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT sigrunsmola hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT juliacarolineradosa hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT mathiaswagner hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT lucgtmorris hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT victoriabozzato hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT alessandrobozzato hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT bernhardschick hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
AT maximilianlinxweiler hpvstatusasprognosticbiomarkerinheadandneckcancerwhichmethodfitsthebestforoutcomeprediction
_version_ 1717367793520738304