From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification
Abstract Quantifications are produced by several disciplinary houses in a myriad of different styles. The concerns about unethical use of algorithms, unintended consequences of metrics, as well as the warning about statistical and mathematical malpractices are all part of a general malaise, symptoms...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0 |
id |
doaj-d1a1ccb19d89495a9345aaaa652ea0c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d1a1ccb19d89495a9345aaaa652ea0c32021-08-22T11:32:16ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922020-08-01711810.1057/s41599-020-00557-0From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantificationAndrea Saltelli0Monica Di Fiore1Open Evidence Research, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheAbstract Quantifications are produced by several disciplinary houses in a myriad of different styles. The concerns about unethical use of algorithms, unintended consequences of metrics, as well as the warning about statistical and mathematical malpractices are all part of a general malaise, symptoms of our tight addiction to quantification. What problems are shared by all these instances of quantification? After reviewing existing concerns about different domains, the present perspective article illustrates the need and the urgency for an encompassing ethics of quantification. The difficulties to discipline the existing regime of numerification are addressed; obstacles and lock-ins are identified. Finally, indications for policies for different actors are suggested.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Saltelli Monica Di Fiore |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Saltelli Monica Di Fiore From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
author_facet |
Andrea Saltelli Monica Di Fiore |
author_sort |
Andrea Saltelli |
title |
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
title_short |
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
title_full |
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
title_fullStr |
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
title_full_unstemmed |
From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
title_sort |
from sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification |
publisher |
Springer Nature |
series |
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
issn |
2662-9992 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Quantifications are produced by several disciplinary houses in a myriad of different styles. The concerns about unethical use of algorithms, unintended consequences of metrics, as well as the warning about statistical and mathematical malpractices are all part of a general malaise, symptoms of our tight addiction to quantification. What problems are shared by all these instances of quantification? After reviewing existing concerns about different domains, the present perspective article illustrates the need and the urgency for an encompassing ethics of quantification. The difficulties to discipline the existing regime of numerification are addressed; obstacles and lock-ins are identified. Finally, indications for policies for different actors are suggested. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00557-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasaltelli fromsociologyofquantificationtoethicsofquantification AT monicadifiore fromsociologyofquantificationtoethicsofquantification |
_version_ |
1721199695734243328 |