Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS

Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa C. Brouwers, Denis Ako-Arrey, Karen Spithoff, Marija Vukmirovic, Ivan D. Florez, John N. Lavis, Francoise Cluzeau, Govin Permanand, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Yaolong Chen, On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9
id doaj-d19303186d2041e081b3b7175138ed29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d19303186d2041e081b3b7175138ed292020-11-24T21:23:12ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052018-06-011611910.1186/s12961-018-0334-9Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HSMelissa C. Brouwers0Denis Ako-Arrey1Karen Spithoff2Marija Vukmirovic3Ivan D. Florez4John N. Lavis5Francoise Cluzeau6Govin Permanand7Xavier Bosch-Capblanch8Yaolong Chen9On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research TeamMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityImperial College LondonThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceSwiss Tropical and Public Health InstituteLanzhou University (Evidence Based Medicine Center)Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. Methods To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. Results In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. Conclusions The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9Health systems guidanceHealth systemHealth policyQuality appraisal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa C. Brouwers
Denis Ako-Arrey
Karen Spithoff
Marija Vukmirovic
Ivan D. Florez
John N. Lavis
Francoise Cluzeau
Govin Permanand
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
Yaolong Chen
On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team
spellingShingle Melissa C. Brouwers
Denis Ako-Arrey
Karen Spithoff
Marija Vukmirovic
Ivan D. Florez
John N. Lavis
Francoise Cluzeau
Govin Permanand
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
Yaolong Chen
On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health systems guidance
Health system
Health policy
Quality appraisal
author_facet Melissa C. Brouwers
Denis Ako-Arrey
Karen Spithoff
Marija Vukmirovic
Ivan D. Florez
John N. Lavis
Francoise Cluzeau
Govin Permanand
Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
Yaolong Chen
On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team
author_sort Melissa C. Brouwers
title Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
title_short Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
title_full Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
title_fullStr Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
title_full_unstemmed Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
title_sort validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the agree-hs
publisher BMC
series Health Research Policy and Systems
issn 1478-4505
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. Methods To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. Results In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. Conclusions The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org.
topic Health systems guidance
Health system
Health policy
Quality appraisal
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9
work_keys_str_mv AT melissacbrouwers validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT denisakoarrey validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT karenspithoff validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT marijavukmirovic validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT ivandflorez validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT johnnlavis validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT francoisecluzeau validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT govinpermanand validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT xavierboschcapblanch validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT yaolongchen validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
AT onbehalfoftheagreehsresearchteam validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs
_version_ 1725992999018561536