Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Health Research Policy and Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9 |
id |
doaj-d19303186d2041e081b3b7175138ed29 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d19303186d2041e081b3b7175138ed292020-11-24T21:23:12ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052018-06-011611910.1186/s12961-018-0334-9Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HSMelissa C. Brouwers0Denis Ako-Arrey1Karen Spithoff2Marija Vukmirovic3Ivan D. Florez4John N. Lavis5Francoise Cluzeau6Govin Permanand7Xavier Bosch-Capblanch8Yaolong Chen9On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research TeamMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityMcMaster UniversityImperial College LondonThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceSwiss Tropical and Public Health InstituteLanzhou University (Evidence Based Medicine Center)Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. Methods To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. Results In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. Conclusions The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9Health systems guidanceHealth systemHealth policyQuality appraisal |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Melissa C. Brouwers Denis Ako-Arrey Karen Spithoff Marija Vukmirovic Ivan D. Florez John N. Lavis Francoise Cluzeau Govin Permanand Xavier Bosch-Capblanch Yaolong Chen On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team |
spellingShingle |
Melissa C. Brouwers Denis Ako-Arrey Karen Spithoff Marija Vukmirovic Ivan D. Florez John N. Lavis Francoise Cluzeau Govin Permanand Xavier Bosch-Capblanch Yaolong Chen On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS Health Research Policy and Systems Health systems guidance Health system Health policy Quality appraisal |
author_facet |
Melissa C. Brouwers Denis Ako-Arrey Karen Spithoff Marija Vukmirovic Ivan D. Florez John N. Lavis Francoise Cluzeau Govin Permanand Xavier Bosch-Capblanch Yaolong Chen On behalf of the AGREE-HS Research Team |
author_sort |
Melissa C. Brouwers |
title |
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_short |
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_full |
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_fullStr |
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS |
title_sort |
validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the agree-hs |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Health Research Policy and Systems |
issn |
1478-4505 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG – the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS. Methods To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool’s measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response. Results In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS. Conclusions The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org. |
topic |
Health systems guidance Health system Health policy Quality appraisal |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melissacbrouwers validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT denisakoarrey validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT karenspithoff validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT marijavukmirovic validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT ivandflorez validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT johnnlavis validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT francoisecluzeau validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT govinpermanand validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT xavierboschcapblanch validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT yaolongchen validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs AT onbehalfoftheagreehsresearchteam validityandusabilitytestingofahealthsystemsguidanceappraisaltooltheagreehs |
_version_ |
1725992999018561536 |