The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous multifaceted patient-centered interventions at primary care level in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) after discharge on achieving clinical practice guideline goals and reducing the rate of hospital readmissions for cardiovasc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oleksii Korzh, Yevgenii Nikolenko, Anna Titkova, Olena Pavlova, Kira Vovk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Light House Polyclinic Mangalore 2021-06-01
Series:Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ojhas.org/issue77/2021-1-3.html
id doaj-d16530364fc7487082b0cb930cb98b65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d16530364fc7487082b0cb930cb98b652021-09-05T05:28:52ZengLight House Polyclinic Mangalore Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences0972-59972021-06-01201The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary CareOleksii Korzh0Yevgenii Nikolenko1Anna Titkova2Olena Pavlova3Kira Vovk4Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Department of General Practice-Family Medicine, Kharkiv, UkraineVN Karazin Kharkiv National University, Department of General Practice-Family Medicine, Kharkiv, UkraineKharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Department of General Practice-Family Medicine, Kharkiv, UkraineKharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Department of General Practice-Family Medicine, Kharkiv, UkraineVN Karazin Kharkiv National University, Department of General Practice-Family Medicine, Kharkiv, UkraineThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous multifaceted patient-centered interventions at primary care level in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) after discharge on achieving clinical practice guideline goals and reducing the rate of hospital readmissions for cardiovascular diseases. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted enrolled patients with MI from January 2, 2017 to December 31, 2019. Patients received medication reconciliation and education from a family physician before hospital discharge. The intervention group (IG) received continuous consultations from the family physician after discharge, whereas the control group (CG) did not. Primary outcomes included achieving blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7% targets. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as re-hospitalization due to MI, unstable angina and stroke. Results: Two hundred and nineteen patients completed the study protocol (110 in the IG and 109 in the CG). The rate of achieving blood pressure goal was similar between the two groups. More patients in the IG achieved LDL-C and HbA1c goals than those in the CG at 1 year and 2 years post discharge. However, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of MACEs between the two groups. Diabetes was the only independent predictor of rehospitalization due to a MACE. Conclusions: Family physicians interventions led to a higher rate of optimal controlled modifiable risk factors but did not significantly reduce the MACE rate in the patients with MI.https://www.ojhas.org/issue77/2021-1-3.htmlmyocardial infarctionprimary carefamily physicianeducation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleksii Korzh
Yevgenii Nikolenko
Anna Titkova
Olena Pavlova
Kira Vovk
spellingShingle Oleksii Korzh
Yevgenii Nikolenko
Anna Titkova
Olena Pavlova
Kira Vovk
The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences
myocardial infarction
primary care
family physician
education
author_facet Oleksii Korzh
Yevgenii Nikolenko
Anna Titkova
Olena Pavlova
Kira Vovk
author_sort Oleksii Korzh
title The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
title_short The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
title_full The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
title_fullStr The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
title_full_unstemmed The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Myocardial Infarction in Primary Care
title_sort long-term clinical outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction in primary care
publisher Light House Polyclinic Mangalore
series Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences
issn 0972-5997
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous multifaceted patient-centered interventions at primary care level in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) after discharge on achieving clinical practice guideline goals and reducing the rate of hospital readmissions for cardiovascular diseases. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted enrolled patients with MI from January 2, 2017 to December 31, 2019. Patients received medication reconciliation and education from a family physician before hospital discharge. The intervention group (IG) received continuous consultations from the family physician after discharge, whereas the control group (CG) did not. Primary outcomes included achieving blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7% targets. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as re-hospitalization due to MI, unstable angina and stroke. Results: Two hundred and nineteen patients completed the study protocol (110 in the IG and 109 in the CG). The rate of achieving blood pressure goal was similar between the two groups. More patients in the IG achieved LDL-C and HbA1c goals than those in the CG at 1 year and 2 years post discharge. However, there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of MACEs between the two groups. Diabetes was the only independent predictor of rehospitalization due to a MACE. Conclusions: Family physicians interventions led to a higher rate of optimal controlled modifiable risk factors but did not significantly reduce the MACE rate in the patients with MI.
topic myocardial infarction
primary care
family physician
education
url https://www.ojhas.org/issue77/2021-1-3.html
work_keys_str_mv AT oleksiikorzh thelongtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT yevgeniinikolenko thelongtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT annatitkova thelongtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT olenapavlova thelongtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT kiravovk thelongtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT oleksiikorzh longtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT yevgeniinikolenko longtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT annatitkova longtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT olenapavlova longtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
AT kiravovk longtermclinicaloutcomesinpatientsaftermyocardialinfarctioninprimarycare
_version_ 1717814488991793152