Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective. To provide a current and comprehensive understanding of the cost-effectiveness of DMTs for the treatment of MS by quantitatively evaluating the quality of recent cost-effectiveness studies and exploring how the field has progressed from past recommendations. Methods. We assessed the quali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Yamamoto, Jonathan D. Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Autoimmune Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/784364
id doaj-d15a2df231ea48a88c815f0bfa7b9974
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d15a2df231ea48a88c815f0bfa7b99742020-11-25T01:48:07ZengHindawi LimitedAutoimmune Diseases2090-04222090-04302012-01-01201210.1155/2012/784364784364Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureDavid Yamamoto0Jonathan D. Campbell1Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, 13001 E 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USADepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USAObjective. To provide a current and comprehensive understanding of the cost-effectiveness of DMTs for the treatment of MS by quantitatively evaluating the quality of recent cost-effectiveness studies and exploring how the field has progressed from past recommendations. Methods. We assessed the quality of studies that met our systematic literature search criteria using the Quality of Health Economic Studies validated instrument. Results. Of the 82 studies that met our initial search criteria, we included 22 in this review. Four studies (18%) achieved quality category 2, three studies (14%) achieved quality category 3, and 15 studies (68%) achieved the highest quality category 4. 91% of studies were simulation models. 13 studies (59%) had quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure, included a societal perspective in the analysis, and utilized time horizons of 10 years to lifetime. Conclusions. To continue to improve the cost-effectiveness evidence of DMTs, we recommend: lifetime horizons, societal perspectives, and QALYs; supplemental evidence with shorter horizons, payer perspectives, and clinical outcomes to inform multiple decision makers; development of modeling and input standards for comparability; head-to-head RCTs between DMTs and long-term prospective studies; and comprehensive cost-effectiveness studies that compare all appropriate DMTs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/784364
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Yamamoto
Jonathan D. Campbell
spellingShingle David Yamamoto
Jonathan D. Campbell
Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Autoimmune Diseases
author_facet David Yamamoto
Jonathan D. Campbell
author_sort David Yamamoto
title Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Autoimmune Diseases
issn 2090-0422
2090-0430
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objective. To provide a current and comprehensive understanding of the cost-effectiveness of DMTs for the treatment of MS by quantitatively evaluating the quality of recent cost-effectiveness studies and exploring how the field has progressed from past recommendations. Methods. We assessed the quality of studies that met our systematic literature search criteria using the Quality of Health Economic Studies validated instrument. Results. Of the 82 studies that met our initial search criteria, we included 22 in this review. Four studies (18%) achieved quality category 2, three studies (14%) achieved quality category 3, and 15 studies (68%) achieved the highest quality category 4. 91% of studies were simulation models. 13 studies (59%) had quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure, included a societal perspective in the analysis, and utilized time horizons of 10 years to lifetime. Conclusions. To continue to improve the cost-effectiveness evidence of DMTs, we recommend: lifetime horizons, societal perspectives, and QALYs; supplemental evidence with shorter horizons, payer perspectives, and clinical outcomes to inform multiple decision makers; development of modeling and input standards for comparability; head-to-head RCTs between DMTs and long-term prospective studies; and comprehensive cost-effectiveness studies that compare all appropriate DMTs.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/784364
work_keys_str_mv AT davidyamamoto costeffectivenessofmultiplesclerosisdiseasemodifyingtherapiesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT jonathandcampbell costeffectivenessofmultiplesclerosisdiseasemodifyingtherapiesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1725012769562951680