Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
<p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD) scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effe...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-d158b940eb54449f926120652068de81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d158b940eb54449f926120652068de812020-11-25T00:32:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-03-01121871188810.5194/amt-12-1871-2019Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidarF. Kelberlau0J. Mann1NTNU, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark<p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD) scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effects through advanced raw data processing. The squeezing method is based on the assumption of frozen turbulence and introduces a time delay into the raw data processing in order to reduce cross-contamination. The two-beam method uses only certain laser beams in the reconstruction of wind vector components to overcome averaging along the measurement circle. Models are developed for conventional VAD scanning and for both new data processing methods to predict the spectra and identify systematic differences between the methods. Numerical modeling and comparison with measurement data were both used to assess the performance of the methods. We found that the squeezing method reduces cross-contamination by eliminating the resonance effect caused by the longitudinal separation of measurement points and also considerably reduces the averaging along the measurement circle. The two-beam method eliminates this averaging effect completely. The combined use of the squeezing and two-beam methods substantially improves the ability of VAD scanning wind lidars to measure in-wind (<span class="inline-formula"><i>u</i></span>) and vertical (<span class="inline-formula"><i>w</i></span>) fluctuations.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. Kelberlau J. Mann |
spellingShingle |
F. Kelberlau J. Mann Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
author_facet |
F. Kelberlau J. Mann |
author_sort |
F. Kelberlau |
title |
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
title_short |
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
title_full |
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
title_fullStr |
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
title_full_unstemmed |
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
title_sort |
better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
issn |
1867-1381 1867-8548 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
<p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD)
scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements
due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity
components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effects
through advanced raw data processing. The squeezing method is based on the
assumption of frozen turbulence and introduces a time delay into the raw data
processing in order to reduce cross-contamination. The two-beam method uses
only certain laser beams in the reconstruction of wind vector components to
overcome averaging along the measurement circle. Models are developed for
conventional VAD scanning and for both new data processing methods to predict
the spectra and identify systematic differences between the methods.
Numerical modeling and comparison with measurement data were both used to
assess the performance of the methods. We found that the squeezing method
reduces cross-contamination by eliminating the resonance effect caused by the
longitudinal separation of measurement points and also considerably reduces
the averaging along the measurement circle. The two-beam method eliminates this
averaging effect completely. The combined use of the squeezing and two-beam
methods substantially improves the ability of VAD scanning wind lidars to
measure in-wind (<span class="inline-formula"><i>u</i></span>) and vertical (<span class="inline-formula"><i>w</i></span>) fluctuations.</p> |
url |
https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fkelberlau betterturbulencespectrafromvelocityazimuthdisplayscanningwindlidar AT jmann betterturbulencespectrafromvelocityazimuthdisplayscanningwindlidar |
_version_ |
1725318186793959424 |