Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar

<p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD) scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Kelberlau, J. Mann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf
id doaj-d158b940eb54449f926120652068de81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d158b940eb54449f926120652068de812020-11-25T00:32:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-03-01121871188810.5194/amt-12-1871-2019Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidarF. Kelberlau0J. Mann1NTNU, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDTU Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark<p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD) scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effects through advanced raw data processing. The squeezing method is based on the assumption of frozen turbulence and introduces a time delay into the raw data processing in order to reduce cross-contamination. The two-beam method uses only certain laser beams in the reconstruction of wind vector components to overcome averaging along the measurement circle. Models are developed for conventional VAD scanning and for both new data processing methods to predict the spectra and identify systematic differences between the methods. Numerical modeling and comparison with measurement data were both used to assess the performance of the methods. We found that the squeezing method reduces cross-contamination by eliminating the resonance effect caused by the longitudinal separation of measurement points and also considerably reduces the averaging along the measurement circle. The two-beam method eliminates this averaging effect completely. The combined use of the squeezing and two-beam methods substantially improves the ability of VAD scanning wind lidars to measure in-wind (<span class="inline-formula"><i>u</i></span>) and vertical (<span class="inline-formula"><i>w</i></span>) fluctuations.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Kelberlau
J. Mann
spellingShingle F. Kelberlau
J. Mann
Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet F. Kelberlau
J. Mann
author_sort F. Kelberlau
title Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
title_short Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
title_full Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
title_fullStr Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
title_full_unstemmed Better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
title_sort better turbulence spectra from velocity–azimuth display scanning wind lidar
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2019-03-01
description <p>Turbulent velocity spectra derived from velocity–azimuth display (VAD) scanning wind lidars deviate from spectra derived from one-point measurements due to averaging effects and cross-contamination among the velocity components. This work presents two novel methods for minimizing these effects through advanced raw data processing. The squeezing method is based on the assumption of frozen turbulence and introduces a time delay into the raw data processing in order to reduce cross-contamination. The two-beam method uses only certain laser beams in the reconstruction of wind vector components to overcome averaging along the measurement circle. Models are developed for conventional VAD scanning and for both new data processing methods to predict the spectra and identify systematic differences between the methods. Numerical modeling and comparison with measurement data were both used to assess the performance of the methods. We found that the squeezing method reduces cross-contamination by eliminating the resonance effect caused by the longitudinal separation of measurement points and also considerably reduces the averaging along the measurement circle. The two-beam method eliminates this averaging effect completely. The combined use of the squeezing and two-beam methods substantially improves the ability of VAD scanning wind lidars to measure in-wind (<span class="inline-formula"><i>u</i></span>) and vertical (<span class="inline-formula"><i>w</i></span>) fluctuations.</p>
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/1871/2019/amt-12-1871-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fkelberlau betterturbulencespectrafromvelocityazimuthdisplayscanningwindlidar
AT jmann betterturbulencespectrafromvelocityazimuthdisplayscanningwindlidar
_version_ 1725318186793959424