For Queen and Country! National Identity and British Post-War Use of Military Power

British post-war security policy and use of military power is not subjugated by the structures of or interaction in the international system. Rather, British use of military power is strongly influenced by a territorially sovereign identity and an institutional balance between Crown and Parliament....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan Werner Mathiasen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian Military Studies 2020-11-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sjms.nu/articles/33
Description
Summary:British post-war security policy and use of military power is not subjugated by the structures of or interaction in the international system. Rather, British use of military power is strongly influenced by a territorially sovereign identity and an institutional balance between Crown and Parliament. British national identity originate in the historical struggle to maintain cohesion and political stability in Britain. From the Glories Revolution to the Second World War territorial sovereignty and institutional independence have defined Britain as an international actor and framed its security policy. Consequently, the territorially sovereign identity and institutional balance between Crown and Parliament continuously influence British security policy. The post-war use of British military power from the Suez Crisis in 1956 to the European Security and Defence Policy, thus, primarily recovers an internal institutional balance. An institutional balance that also played an underlying role in the British withdrawal from the European Union.
ISSN:2596-3856