Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review

Adolescence is a challenging time for the medical management of type 1 diabetes. Thus, a range of psychoeducational interventions have been developed to improve diabetes management among youth. Systematic reviews of this literature have emphasized the effectiveness of interventions for improving pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lana Bergmame, Steven Shaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-07-01
Series:Continuity in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://continuityineducation.org/articles/28
id doaj-d13823154d984fb4a9add32657183e2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d13823154d984fb4a9add32657183e2c2021-08-11T07:57:40ZengUbiquity PressContinuity in Education 2631-91792021-07-012110.5334/cie.2820Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping ReviewLana Bergmame0Steven Shaw1McGill UniversityMcGill UniversityAdolescence is a challenging time for the medical management of type 1 diabetes. Thus, a range of psychoeducational interventions have been developed to improve diabetes management among youth. Systematic reviews of this literature have emphasized the effectiveness of interventions for improving patient outcomes. However, knowledge beyond what works is required for interventions to be adopted into routine clinical practice. The objective of this scoping review was to map the clinical utility of the literature based on a variety of indicators, including the problem base, context placement, information gain, transparency, pragmatism, and patient-centeredness of the research. This lens for reviewing research is consistent with the biopsychosocial model and an increasing focus on reducing disability, including activity limitation and participation restriction. PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINHAL databases were searched for evaluative psychoeducational intervention studies published between January 2005 and October 2020. Two cited reference searches and one reference list search were also performed. Fifty studies describing 46 different interventions were identified. The clinical utility of the interventions was highly variable. A detailed overview of the clinical utility of the literature is provided with an emphasis on current gaps and shortcomings to be addressed in future research. This work helps advance the translation of clinical knowledge into practice in schools, homes, and communities; and, ultimately, improve the health and well-being of adolescents with T1D.https://continuityineducation.org/articles/28diabetesadolescentspsychoeducational interventionsclinical utility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lana Bergmame
Steven Shaw
spellingShingle Lana Bergmame
Steven Shaw
Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
Continuity in Education
diabetes
adolescents
psychoeducational interventions
clinical utility
author_facet Lana Bergmame
Steven Shaw
author_sort Lana Bergmame
title Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
title_short Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
title_full Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Utility of Psychoeducational Interventions for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A Scoping Review
title_sort clinical utility of psychoeducational interventions for youth with type 1 diabetes: a scoping review
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Continuity in Education
issn 2631-9179
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Adolescence is a challenging time for the medical management of type 1 diabetes. Thus, a range of psychoeducational interventions have been developed to improve diabetes management among youth. Systematic reviews of this literature have emphasized the effectiveness of interventions for improving patient outcomes. However, knowledge beyond what works is required for interventions to be adopted into routine clinical practice. The objective of this scoping review was to map the clinical utility of the literature based on a variety of indicators, including the problem base, context placement, information gain, transparency, pragmatism, and patient-centeredness of the research. This lens for reviewing research is consistent with the biopsychosocial model and an increasing focus on reducing disability, including activity limitation and participation restriction. PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and CINHAL databases were searched for evaluative psychoeducational intervention studies published between January 2005 and October 2020. Two cited reference searches and one reference list search were also performed. Fifty studies describing 46 different interventions were identified. The clinical utility of the interventions was highly variable. A detailed overview of the clinical utility of the literature is provided with an emphasis on current gaps and shortcomings to be addressed in future research. This work helps advance the translation of clinical knowledge into practice in schools, homes, and communities; and, ultimately, improve the health and well-being of adolescents with T1D.
topic diabetes
adolescents
psychoeducational interventions
clinical utility
url https://continuityineducation.org/articles/28
work_keys_str_mv AT lanabergmame clinicalutilityofpsychoeducationalinterventionsforyouthwithtype1diabetesascopingreview
AT stevenshaw clinicalutilityofpsychoeducationalinterventionsforyouthwithtype1diabetesascopingreview
_version_ 1721211537839882240