How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study
Abstract Background Management of spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is still subject to debate. Although encouraging results of recent studies about outpatient management with chest drains fitted with a one-way valve, no data exist concerning application of this strategy in real life conditions. We asse...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Emergency Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12873-018-0213-2 |
id |
doaj-d1354d82d4184becab0eb1ac1d82f786 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d1354d82d4184becab0eb1ac1d82f7862020-11-25T02:14:11ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2019-01-011911910.1186/s12873-018-0213-2How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive studyS. Kepka0J. C. Dalphin1J. B. Pretalli2A. L. Parmentier3D. Lauque4G. Trebes5EXPPI study groupF. Mauny6T. Desmettre7Emergency department, CHRU of Strasbourg – Nouvel hôpital civilUMR 6249 Chronoenvironnement/University of Franche Comté, La Bouloie - UFR Sciences et TechniquesEmergency department, CHRU of BesançonUMR 6249 Chronoenvironnement/University of Franche Comté, La Bouloie - UFR Sciences et TechniquesEmergency department, CHRU of ToulouseEmergency department, La Tronche - CHRU of GrenobleUMR 6249 Chronoenvironnement/University of Franche Comté, La Bouloie - UFR Sciences et TechniquesUMR 6249 Chronoenvironnement/University of Franche Comté, La Bouloie - UFR Sciences et TechniquesAbstract Background Management of spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is still subject to debate. Although encouraging results of recent studies about outpatient management with chest drains fitted with a one-way valve, no data exist concerning application of this strategy in real life conditions. We assessed how SP are managed in Emergency departments (EDs), in particular the role of outpatient management, the types of interventions and the specialty of the physicians who perform these interventions. Methods From June 2009 to May 2013, all cases of spontaneous primary (PSP) and spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (SSP) from EDs of 14 hospitals in France were retrospectively included. First line treatment (observation, aspiration, thoracic drainage or surgery), type of management (admitted, discharged to home directly from the ED, outpatient management) and the specialty of the physicians were collected from the medical files of the ED. Results Among 1868 SP included, an outpatient management strategy was chosen in 179 PSP (10%) and 38 SSP (2%), mostly when no intervention was performed. Only 25 PSP (1%) were treated by aspiration and discharged to home after ED admission. Observation was the chosen strategy for 985 patients (53%). In 883 patients with an intervention (47%), it was performed by emergency physicians in 71% of cases and thoracic drainage was the most frequent choice (670 patients, 76%). Conclusions Our study showed the low level of implementation of outpatient management for PS in France. Despite encouraging results of studies concerning outpatient management, chest tube drainage and hospitalization remain preponderant in the treatment of SP.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12873-018-0213-2Spontaneous pneumothoraxOutpatient managementObservationAspirationThoracic drainageEmergency department |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. Kepka J. C. Dalphin J. B. Pretalli A. L. Parmentier D. Lauque G. Trebes EXPPI study group F. Mauny T. Desmettre |
spellingShingle |
S. Kepka J. C. Dalphin J. B. Pretalli A. L. Parmentier D. Lauque G. Trebes EXPPI study group F. Mauny T. Desmettre How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study BMC Emergency Medicine Spontaneous pneumothorax Outpatient management Observation Aspiration Thoracic drainage Emergency department |
author_facet |
S. Kepka J. C. Dalphin J. B. Pretalli A. L. Parmentier D. Lauque G. Trebes EXPPI study group F. Mauny T. Desmettre |
author_sort |
S. Kepka |
title |
How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study |
title_short |
How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study |
title_full |
How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study |
title_fullStr |
How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed |
How spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a French multicentre descriptive study |
title_sort |
how spontaneous pneumothorax is managed in emergency departments: a french multicentre descriptive study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Emergency Medicine |
issn |
1471-227X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Management of spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is still subject to debate. Although encouraging results of recent studies about outpatient management with chest drains fitted with a one-way valve, no data exist concerning application of this strategy in real life conditions. We assessed how SP are managed in Emergency departments (EDs), in particular the role of outpatient management, the types of interventions and the specialty of the physicians who perform these interventions. Methods From June 2009 to May 2013, all cases of spontaneous primary (PSP) and spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (SSP) from EDs of 14 hospitals in France were retrospectively included. First line treatment (observation, aspiration, thoracic drainage or surgery), type of management (admitted, discharged to home directly from the ED, outpatient management) and the specialty of the physicians were collected from the medical files of the ED. Results Among 1868 SP included, an outpatient management strategy was chosen in 179 PSP (10%) and 38 SSP (2%), mostly when no intervention was performed. Only 25 PSP (1%) were treated by aspiration and discharged to home after ED admission. Observation was the chosen strategy for 985 patients (53%). In 883 patients with an intervention (47%), it was performed by emergency physicians in 71% of cases and thoracic drainage was the most frequent choice (670 patients, 76%). Conclusions Our study showed the low level of implementation of outpatient management for PS in France. Despite encouraging results of studies concerning outpatient management, chest tube drainage and hospitalization remain preponderant in the treatment of SP. |
topic |
Spontaneous pneumothorax Outpatient management Observation Aspiration Thoracic drainage Emergency department |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12873-018-0213-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT skepka howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT jcdalphin howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT jbpretalli howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT alparmentier howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT dlauque howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT gtrebes howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT exppistudygroup howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT fmauny howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy AT tdesmettre howspontaneouspneumothoraxismanagedinemergencydepartmentsafrenchmulticentredescriptivestudy |
_version_ |
1724901277202120704 |