Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models

Several different types of parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation for cloud and climate models have been developed over the past decades, ranging from empirically-derived expressions to parameterizations of ice crystal nucleation rates derived from theory, including the parameterization de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. A. Curry, V. I. Khvorostyanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1151/2012/acp-12-1151-2012.pdf
id doaj-d10f3d51823747a2847a307e0f2cdbbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d10f3d51823747a2847a307e0f2cdbbc2020-11-24T23:24:43ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242012-01-011221151117210.5194/acp-12-1151-2012Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate modelsJ. A. CurryV. I. KhvorostyanovSeveral different types of parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation for cloud and climate models have been developed over the past decades, ranging from empirically-derived expressions to parameterizations of ice crystal nucleation rates derived from theory, including the parameterization developed by the authors that includes simultaneous dependence on the temperature and saturation ratio, hereafter referred to as KC. Parameterizations schemes that address the deliquescence-heterogeneous-freezing (DHetF), which combines the modes of condensation freezing and immersion freezing, are assessed here in the context of thermodynamic constraints, laboratory measurements, and recent field measurements. It is shown that empirical schemes depending only on the ice saturation ratio or only on temperature can produce reasonable crystal concentrations, but ice crystal nucleation is thermodynamically prohibited in certain regions of the temperature-saturation ratio phase space. Some recent empirical parameterizations yield clouds that are almost entire liquid at temperatures as low as −35 °C in contrast to cloud climatology. Reasonable performance of the KC ice nucleation scheme is demonstrated by comparison with numerous data from several recent field campaigns, laboratory data, climatology of cloud phase-state. Several mis-applications of the KC parameterization that appeared recently in the literature are described and corrected. It is emphasized here that a correct application of the KC scheme requires integration of the individual nucleation rates over the measured size spectrum of ice nuclei that represent a fraction or several fractions of the environmental aerosol with specific ice nucleation properties. The concentration in these fractions can be substantially smaller than that of the total aerosol, but greater than the crystal concentration measured by an experimental device. Simulations with temperature-dependent active site area or with several IN fractions having different properties show that ice nucleation in the KC scheme occurs in a wide temperature range of 10–20 °C, which depends on IN properties. Simulation with a spectral bin model and correct application of KC scheme adequately describes ice nucleation via the DHetF mode and yields crystal concentrations and phase state close to those measured in the single-layer stratocumulus cloud observed in the Mixed Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (MPACE). An assessment of some deficiencies in current parcel modeling methods and cloud chamber observations and their impact on parameterization development and evaluation is provided.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1151/2012/acp-12-1151-2012.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. A. Curry
V. I. Khvorostyanov
spellingShingle J. A. Curry
V. I. Khvorostyanov
Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet J. A. Curry
V. I. Khvorostyanov
author_sort J. A. Curry
title Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
title_short Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
title_full Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
title_fullStr Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
title_sort assessment of some parameterizations of heterogeneous ice nucleation in cloud and climate models
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Several different types of parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation for cloud and climate models have been developed over the past decades, ranging from empirically-derived expressions to parameterizations of ice crystal nucleation rates derived from theory, including the parameterization developed by the authors that includes simultaneous dependence on the temperature and saturation ratio, hereafter referred to as KC. Parameterizations schemes that address the deliquescence-heterogeneous-freezing (DHetF), which combines the modes of condensation freezing and immersion freezing, are assessed here in the context of thermodynamic constraints, laboratory measurements, and recent field measurements. It is shown that empirical schemes depending only on the ice saturation ratio or only on temperature can produce reasonable crystal concentrations, but ice crystal nucleation is thermodynamically prohibited in certain regions of the temperature-saturation ratio phase space. Some recent empirical parameterizations yield clouds that are almost entire liquid at temperatures as low as −35 °C in contrast to cloud climatology. Reasonable performance of the KC ice nucleation scheme is demonstrated by comparison with numerous data from several recent field campaigns, laboratory data, climatology of cloud phase-state. Several mis-applications of the KC parameterization that appeared recently in the literature are described and corrected. It is emphasized here that a correct application of the KC scheme requires integration of the individual nucleation rates over the measured size spectrum of ice nuclei that represent a fraction or several fractions of the environmental aerosol with specific ice nucleation properties. The concentration in these fractions can be substantially smaller than that of the total aerosol, but greater than the crystal concentration measured by an experimental device. Simulations with temperature-dependent active site area or with several IN fractions having different properties show that ice nucleation in the KC scheme occurs in a wide temperature range of 10–20 °C, which depends on IN properties. Simulation with a spectral bin model and correct application of KC scheme adequately describes ice nucleation via the DHetF mode and yields crystal concentrations and phase state close to those measured in the single-layer stratocumulus cloud observed in the Mixed Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (MPACE). An assessment of some deficiencies in current parcel modeling methods and cloud chamber observations and their impact on parameterization development and evaluation is provided.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/1151/2012/acp-12-1151-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jacurry assessmentofsomeparameterizationsofheterogeneousicenucleationincloudandclimatemodels
AT vikhvorostyanov assessmentofsomeparameterizationsofheterogeneousicenucleationincloudandclimatemodels
_version_ 1725559139645521920