Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.

Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determinin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Dunlop, Liam Welsh, Dualta McQuaid, Jamie Dean, Sarah Gulliford, Vibeke Hansen, Shreerang Bhide, Chris Nutting, Kevin Harrington, Kate Newbold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4364536?pdf=render
id doaj-d10c494507eb4be7bf8c61993d3f8a30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d10c494507eb4be7bf8c61993d3f8a302020-11-25T01:22:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e012014110.1371/journal.pone.0120141Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.Alex DunlopLiam WelshDualta McQuaidJamie DeanSarah GullifordVibeke HansenShreerang BhideChris NuttingKevin HarringtonKate NewboldRadical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF.A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans.Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5-35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2-24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3-17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum.We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4364536?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alex Dunlop
Liam Welsh
Dualta McQuaid
Jamie Dean
Sarah Gulliford
Vibeke Hansen
Shreerang Bhide
Chris Nutting
Kevin Harrington
Kate Newbold
spellingShingle Alex Dunlop
Liam Welsh
Dualta McQuaid
Jamie Dean
Sarah Gulliford
Vibeke Hansen
Shreerang Bhide
Chris Nutting
Kevin Harrington
Kate Newbold
Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alex Dunlop
Liam Welsh
Dualta McQuaid
Jamie Dean
Sarah Gulliford
Vibeke Hansen
Shreerang Bhide
Chris Nutting
Kevin Harrington
Kate Newbold
author_sort Alex Dunlop
title Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
title_short Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
title_full Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
title_fullStr Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Brain-sparing methods for IMRT of head and neck cancer.
title_sort brain-sparing methods for imrt of head and neck cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF.A planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans.Significant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5-35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2-24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3-17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum.We demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4364536?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alexdunlop brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT liamwelsh brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT dualtamcquaid brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT jamiedean brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT sarahgulliford brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT vibekehansen brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT shreerangbhide brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT chrisnutting brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT kevinharrington brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
AT katenewbold brainsparingmethodsforimrtofheadandneckcancer
_version_ 1725127604391903232