The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography

Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a new imaging technology that has been widely used in implantology, oral and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics. This method provides 3-D images that are composed of voxel, which is the smallest image unit, and determines image resolution. Smal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ehsan Hekmatian, Nasim Jafari-Pozve, Ladan Khorrami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2014;volume=11;issue=5;spage=544;epage=548;aulast=Hekmatian
id doaj-d1012c525c774a829a842467350cfa0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d1012c525c774a829a842467350cfa0d2020-11-25T01:06:32ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552014-01-01115544548The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomographyEhsan HekmatianNasim Jafari-PozveLadan KhorramiBackground: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a new imaging technology that has been widely used in implantology, oral and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics. This method provides 3-D images that are composed of voxel, which is the smallest image unit, and determines image resolution. Smaller voxel is associated with the higher resolution and also greater radiation exposure. This study was aimed to find out the effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness. Materials and Methods: Using voxel sizes of 0.30 mm and 0.15 mm, two CBCT protocols (protocol 1: Field of view (FOV) of 15 cm, 85 kVp, 42 mAs, 0.15 mm voxel, 14 s scan time; protocol 2: FOV of 15 cm, 85 kVp, 10 mAs, 0.30 mm voxel, 14 s scan time) were carried out on 16 dry human mandibles with permanent dentition. Mandibular thickness was measured at seven different sites (midline region, bilateral canine regions, bilateral mental foramen regions and bilateral molar regions). Analysis of variance was used for analysis of data using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between different protocols regarding the mandibular thickness (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the insignificant differences of the mandibular thickness measurements using different voxel sizes, it would be more reasonable to use 0.30 mm voxel size instead of 0.15 mm voxel size to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2014;volume=11;issue=5;spage=544;epage=548;aulast=HekmatianCone-beam computed tomographymandiblevoxel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ehsan Hekmatian
Nasim Jafari-Pozve
Ladan Khorrami
spellingShingle Ehsan Hekmatian
Nasim Jafari-Pozve
Ladan Khorrami
The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
Dental Research Journal
Cone-beam computed tomography
mandible
voxel
author_facet Ehsan Hekmatian
Nasim Jafari-Pozve
Ladan Khorrami
author_sort Ehsan Hekmatian
title The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
title_short The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
title_full The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed The effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness in cone-beam computed tomography
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Dental Research Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a new imaging technology that has been widely used in implantology, oral and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics. This method provides 3-D images that are composed of voxel, which is the smallest image unit, and determines image resolution. Smaller voxel is associated with the higher resolution and also greater radiation exposure. This study was aimed to find out the effect of voxel size on the measurement of mandibular thickness. Materials and Methods: Using voxel sizes of 0.30 mm and 0.15 mm, two CBCT protocols (protocol 1: Field of view (FOV) of 15 cm, 85 kVp, 42 mAs, 0.15 mm voxel, 14 s scan time; protocol 2: FOV of 15 cm, 85 kVp, 10 mAs, 0.30 mm voxel, 14 s scan time) were carried out on 16 dry human mandibles with permanent dentition. Mandibular thickness was measured at seven different sites (midline region, bilateral canine regions, bilateral mental foramen regions and bilateral molar regions). Analysis of variance was used for analysis of data using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between different protocols regarding the mandibular thickness (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the insignificant differences of the mandibular thickness measurements using different voxel sizes, it would be more reasonable to use 0.30 mm voxel size instead of 0.15 mm voxel size to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.
topic Cone-beam computed tomography
mandible
voxel
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2014;volume=11;issue=5;spage=544;epage=548;aulast=Hekmatian
work_keys_str_mv AT ehsanhekmatian theeffectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT nasimjafaripozve theeffectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ladankhorrami theeffectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ehsanhekmatian effectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT nasimjafaripozve effectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ladankhorrami effectofvoxelsizeonthemeasurementofmandibularthicknessinconebeamcomputedtomography
_version_ 1725189746288754688