The Impact Factor Fallacy
The use of the journal impact factor (JIF) as a measure for the quality of individual manuscripts and the merits of scientists has faced significant criticism in recent years. We add to the current criticism in arguing that such an application of the JIF in policy and decision making in academia is...
Main Authors: | Frieder M. Paulus, Nicole Cruz, Sören Krach |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487/full |
Similar Items
-
An Exploratory Survey of the Suspicious Open Access Journals
by: Chi-Shiou Lin
Published: (2017-12-01) -
What Motivates Authors of Scholarly Articles? The Importance of Journal Attributes and Potential Audience on Publication Choice
by: Carol Tenopir, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
The Two-Way Street of Open Access Journal Publishing: Flip It and Reverse It
by: Lisa Matthias, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Faculty Use of Open-Access Journals: A Case Study of Faculty Publications and Cited References at a California University
by: Kendall Faulkner
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Developing a scientific journal in a changing world
by: Pochet, B., et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)