Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands

<p>Abstract</p> <p>One application of cognitive radios is to provide broadband wireless access (BWA) in the licensed TV bands on a secondary access basis. This concept is examined to see under what conditions BWA could be viable. Rural areas require long range communication which r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown TimothyX, Sicker DouglasC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2008-01-01
Series:EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Online Access:http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/
id doaj-d0f6693177f04134a1fd8b5ff6868732
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0f6693177f04134a1fd8b5ff68687322020-11-24T22:06:52ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking1687-14721687-14992008-01-0120081695894Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast BandsBrown TimothyXSicker DouglasC<p>Abstract</p> <p>One application of cognitive radios is to provide broadband wireless access (BWA) in the licensed TV bands on a secondary access basis. This concept is examined to see under what conditions BWA could be viable. Rural areas require long range communication which requires spectrum to be available over large areas in order to be used by cognitive radios. Urban areas have less available spectrum at any range. Furthermore, it is not clear what regulatory model would best support BWA. This paper considers demographic (urban, rural) and licensing (unlicensed, nonexclusive licensed, exclusive licensed) dimensions. A general BWA efficiency and economic analysis tool is developed and then example parameters corresponding to each of these regimes are derived. The results indicate that an unlicensed model is viable; however, in urban areas spectrum needs can be met with existing unlicensed spectrum and cognitive radios have no role. In the densest urban areas, the licensed models are not viable. This is not simple because there is less unused spectrum in urban areas. Urban area cognitive radios are constrained to short ranges and many broadband alternatives already exist. As a result the cost per subscriber is prohibitively high. These results provide input to spectrum policy issues.</p>http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brown TimothyX
Sicker DouglasC
spellingShingle Brown TimothyX
Sicker DouglasC
Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
author_facet Brown TimothyX
Sicker DouglasC
author_sort Brown TimothyX
title Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
title_short Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
title_full Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
title_fullStr Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Viability of Broadband Wireless Access under Alternative Licensing Models in the TV Broadcast Bands
title_sort examining the viability of broadband wireless access under alternative licensing models in the tv broadcast bands
publisher SpringerOpen
series EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
issn 1687-1472
1687-1499
publishDate 2008-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>One application of cognitive radios is to provide broadband wireless access (BWA) in the licensed TV bands on a secondary access basis. This concept is examined to see under what conditions BWA could be viable. Rural areas require long range communication which requires spectrum to be available over large areas in order to be used by cognitive radios. Urban areas have less available spectrum at any range. Furthermore, it is not clear what regulatory model would best support BWA. This paper considers demographic (urban, rural) and licensing (unlicensed, nonexclusive licensed, exclusive licensed) dimensions. A general BWA efficiency and economic analysis tool is developed and then example parameters corresponding to each of these regimes are derived. The results indicate that an unlicensed model is viable; however, in urban areas spectrum needs can be met with existing unlicensed spectrum and cognitive radios have no role. In the densest urban areas, the licensed models are not viable. This is not simple because there is less unused spectrum in urban areas. Urban area cognitive radios are constrained to short ranges and many broadband alternatives already exist. As a result the cost per subscriber is prohibitively high. These results provide input to spectrum policy issues.</p>
url http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2008/
work_keys_str_mv AT browntimothyx examiningtheviabilityofbroadbandwirelessaccessunderalternativelicensingmodelsinthetvbroadcastbands
AT sickerdouglasc examiningtheviabilityofbroadbandwirelessaccessunderalternativelicensingmodelsinthetvbroadcastbands
_version_ 1725821336095293440