Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.

Observational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong-Fei Hua, Gao-Qing Wang, Wei Jiang, Jing Huang, Guo-Chong Chen, Cai-De Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render
id doaj-d0f4cc2c46a94038b23ff1d374f2e34d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0f4cc2c46a94038b23ff1d374f2e34d2020-11-25T02:33:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014881610.1371/journal.pone.0148816Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.Yong-Fei HuaGao-Qing WangWei JiangJing HuangGuo-Chong ChenCai-De LuObservational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through May 31, 2015. A random-effects model was assigned to compute summary point estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.Our final analyses included 20 observational studies comprising nearly 5 thousand cases of pancreatic cancer. When comparing the highest with the lowest categories of vitamin C intake, the summary odds ratio/relative risk for case-control studies (14 studies), cohort studies (6 studies) and all studies combined was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78-1.11) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75), respectively. The difference in the findings between case-control and cohort studies was statistically significant (P < .001). Possible publication bias was shown in the meta-analysis of case-control studies.There is insufficient evidence to conclude any relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. The strong inverse association observed in case-control studies may be affected by biases (eg, recall and selection biases) that particularly affect case-control studies and/or potential publication bias. Future prospective studies of vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer are needed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong-Fei Hua
Gao-Qing Wang
Wei Jiang
Jing Huang
Guo-Chong Chen
Cai-De Lu
spellingShingle Yong-Fei Hua
Gao-Qing Wang
Wei Jiang
Jing Huang
Guo-Chong Chen
Cai-De Lu
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yong-Fei Hua
Gao-Qing Wang
Wei Jiang
Jing Huang
Guo-Chong Chen
Cai-De Lu
author_sort Yong-Fei Hua
title Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
title_short Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
title_full Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
title_fullStr Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
title_sort vitamin c intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Observational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through May 31, 2015. A random-effects model was assigned to compute summary point estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.Our final analyses included 20 observational studies comprising nearly 5 thousand cases of pancreatic cancer. When comparing the highest with the lowest categories of vitamin C intake, the summary odds ratio/relative risk for case-control studies (14 studies), cohort studies (6 studies) and all studies combined was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78-1.11) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75), respectively. The difference in the findings between case-control and cohort studies was statistically significant (P < .001). Possible publication bias was shown in the meta-analysis of case-control studies.There is insufficient evidence to conclude any relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. The strong inverse association observed in case-control studies may be affected by biases (eg, recall and selection biases) that particularly affect case-control studies and/or potential publication bias. Future prospective studies of vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer are needed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yongfeihua vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
AT gaoqingwang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
AT weijiang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
AT jinghuang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
AT guochongchen vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
AT caidelu vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies
_version_ 1724812776756477952