Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.
Observational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-d0f4cc2c46a94038b23ff1d374f2e34d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0f4cc2c46a94038b23ff1d374f2e34d2020-11-25T02:33:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014881610.1371/journal.pone.0148816Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies.Yong-Fei HuaGao-Qing WangWei JiangJing HuangGuo-Chong ChenCai-De LuObservational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through May 31, 2015. A random-effects model was assigned to compute summary point estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.Our final analyses included 20 observational studies comprising nearly 5 thousand cases of pancreatic cancer. When comparing the highest with the lowest categories of vitamin C intake, the summary odds ratio/relative risk for case-control studies (14 studies), cohort studies (6 studies) and all studies combined was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78-1.11) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75), respectively. The difference in the findings between case-control and cohort studies was statistically significant (P < .001). Possible publication bias was shown in the meta-analysis of case-control studies.There is insufficient evidence to conclude any relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. The strong inverse association observed in case-control studies may be affected by biases (eg, recall and selection biases) that particularly affect case-control studies and/or potential publication bias. Future prospective studies of vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer are needed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yong-Fei Hua Gao-Qing Wang Wei Jiang Jing Huang Guo-Chong Chen Cai-De Lu |
spellingShingle |
Yong-Fei Hua Gao-Qing Wang Wei Jiang Jing Huang Guo-Chong Chen Cai-De Lu Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yong-Fei Hua Gao-Qing Wang Wei Jiang Jing Huang Guo-Chong Chen Cai-De Lu |
author_sort |
Yong-Fei Hua |
title |
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. |
title_short |
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. |
title_full |
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. |
title_fullStr |
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies. |
title_sort |
vitamin c intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Observational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through May 31, 2015. A random-effects model was assigned to compute summary point estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.Our final analyses included 20 observational studies comprising nearly 5 thousand cases of pancreatic cancer. When comparing the highest with the lowest categories of vitamin C intake, the summary odds ratio/relative risk for case-control studies (14 studies), cohort studies (6 studies) and all studies combined was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78-1.11) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75), respectively. The difference in the findings between case-control and cohort studies was statistically significant (P < .001). Possible publication bias was shown in the meta-analysis of case-control studies.There is insufficient evidence to conclude any relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. The strong inverse association observed in case-control studies may be affected by biases (eg, recall and selection biases) that particularly affect case-control studies and/or potential publication bias. Future prospective studies of vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer are needed. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4747545?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yongfeihua vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies AT gaoqingwang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies AT weijiang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies AT jinghuang vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies AT guochongchen vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies AT caidelu vitamincintakeandpancreaticcancerriskametaanalysisofpublishedcasecontrolandcohortstudies |
_version_ |
1724812776756477952 |