Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data

Hydraulic fracturing enhances hydrocarbon production from low permeability reservoirs. Laboratory tests and direct field measurements do a decent job of predicting the response of the system but are expensive and not easily accessible, thus increasing the need for robust deterministic and numerical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Batoul M. Gisler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2138115
id doaj-d0f13a00ee124084863fb96eef9e07eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0f13a00ee124084863fb96eef9e07eb2021-09-06T00:00:41ZengHindawi-WileyGeofluids1468-81232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/2138115Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale DataBatoul M. Gisler0The University of NeuchâtelHydraulic fracturing enhances hydrocarbon production from low permeability reservoirs. Laboratory tests and direct field measurements do a decent job of predicting the response of the system but are expensive and not easily accessible, thus increasing the need for robust deterministic and numerical solutions. The reliability of these mathematical models hinges on the uncertainties in the input parameters because uncertainty propagates to the output solution resulting in incorrect interpretations. Here, I build a framework for uncertainty quantification for a 1D fracture geometry using Woodford shale data. The proposed framework uses Monte-Carlo-based statistical methods and is comprised of two parts: sensitivity analysis and the probability density functions. Results reveal the transient nature of the sensitivity analysis, showing that Young’s modulus controls the initial pore pressure, which after 1 hour depends on the hydraulic conductivity. Results also show that the leak-off is most sensitive to permeability and thermal expansion coefficient of the rock and that temperature evolution primarily depends on thermal conductivity and the overall heat capacity. Furthermore, the model shows that Young’s modulus controls the initial fracture width, which after 1 hour of injection depends on the thermal expansion coefficient. Finally, the probability density curve of the transient fracture width displays the range of possible fracture aperture and adequate proppant size. The good agreement between the statistical model and field observations shows that the probability density curve can provide a reliable insight into the optimal proppant size.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2138115
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Batoul M. Gisler
spellingShingle Batoul M. Gisler
Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
Geofluids
author_facet Batoul M. Gisler
author_sort Batoul M. Gisler
title Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
title_short Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
title_full Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
title_fullStr Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty Quantification for a Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Application to Woodford Shale Data
title_sort uncertainty quantification for a hydraulic fracture geometry: application to woodford shale data
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Geofluids
issn 1468-8123
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Hydraulic fracturing enhances hydrocarbon production from low permeability reservoirs. Laboratory tests and direct field measurements do a decent job of predicting the response of the system but are expensive and not easily accessible, thus increasing the need for robust deterministic and numerical solutions. The reliability of these mathematical models hinges on the uncertainties in the input parameters because uncertainty propagates to the output solution resulting in incorrect interpretations. Here, I build a framework for uncertainty quantification for a 1D fracture geometry using Woodford shale data. The proposed framework uses Monte-Carlo-based statistical methods and is comprised of two parts: sensitivity analysis and the probability density functions. Results reveal the transient nature of the sensitivity analysis, showing that Young’s modulus controls the initial pore pressure, which after 1 hour depends on the hydraulic conductivity. Results also show that the leak-off is most sensitive to permeability and thermal expansion coefficient of the rock and that temperature evolution primarily depends on thermal conductivity and the overall heat capacity. Furthermore, the model shows that Young’s modulus controls the initial fracture width, which after 1 hour of injection depends on the thermal expansion coefficient. Finally, the probability density curve of the transient fracture width displays the range of possible fracture aperture and adequate proppant size. The good agreement between the statistical model and field observations shows that the probability density curve can provide a reliable insight into the optimal proppant size.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2138115
work_keys_str_mv AT batoulmgisler uncertaintyquantificationforahydraulicfracturegeometryapplicationtowoodfordshaledata
_version_ 1717780309275049984