Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making

Background Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates in breast cancer differ between healthcare regions in Sweden. This is not explained by regional differences in patient age distribution or tumour characteristics, but by differences in patient‐reported information and patient involvement in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Frisell, J. Lagergren, M. Halle, J. deBoniface
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2020-04-01
Series:BJS Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50260
id doaj-d0e9b3d843804595bb79bd5129730f34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0e9b3d843804595bb79bd5129730f342021-04-02T12:23:00ZengOxford University PressBJS Open2474-98422020-04-014223224010.1002/bjs5.50260Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐makingA. Frisell0J. Lagergren1M. Halle2J. deBoniface3Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenBackground Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates in breast cancer differ between healthcare regions in Sweden. This is not explained by regional differences in patient age distribution or tumour characteristics, but by differences in patient‐reported information and patient involvement in the decision‐making process. As socioeconomic status may play a significant role in surgical decision‐making, its potential associations with IBR rates were analysed. Methods Women who had undergone therapeutic mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included in the analysis. Tumour and treatment data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register, and socioeconomic background data from the Central Bureau of Statistics Sweden. Postal questionnaires regarding information about reconstruction and perceived involvement in the preoperative decision‐making process had been sent out in a previous survey. Results In addition to regional differences, lower tumour and nodal category, independent factors increasing the likelihood of having IBR for the 3131 women in the study were living without a registered partner, having current employment and high income per household. Patient‐reported perceived preoperative information (odds ratio (OR) 12·73, 95 per cent c.i. 6·03 to 26·89) and the feeling of being involved in the decision‐making process (OR 2·56, 1·14 to 5·76) remained strong independent predictors of IBR despite adjustment for socioeconomic factors. Importantly, responders to the survey represented a relatively young and wealthy population with a lower tumour burden. Conclusion Several socioeconomic factors independently influence IBR rates; however, patient‐reported information and involvement in the surgical decision‐making process remain independent predictors for the likelihood of having IBR.https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50260
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Frisell
J. Lagergren
M. Halle
J. deBoniface
spellingShingle A. Frisell
J. Lagergren
M. Halle
J. deBoniface
Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
BJS Open
author_facet A. Frisell
J. Lagergren
M. Halle
J. deBoniface
author_sort A. Frisell
title Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
title_short Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
title_full Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
title_fullStr Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
title_full_unstemmed Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
title_sort influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision‐making
publisher Oxford University Press
series BJS Open
issn 2474-9842
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Background Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates in breast cancer differ between healthcare regions in Sweden. This is not explained by regional differences in patient age distribution or tumour characteristics, but by differences in patient‐reported information and patient involvement in the decision‐making process. As socioeconomic status may play a significant role in surgical decision‐making, its potential associations with IBR rates were analysed. Methods Women who had undergone therapeutic mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included in the analysis. Tumour and treatment data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register, and socioeconomic background data from the Central Bureau of Statistics Sweden. Postal questionnaires regarding information about reconstruction and perceived involvement in the preoperative decision‐making process had been sent out in a previous survey. Results In addition to regional differences, lower tumour and nodal category, independent factors increasing the likelihood of having IBR for the 3131 women in the study were living without a registered partner, having current employment and high income per household. Patient‐reported perceived preoperative information (odds ratio (OR) 12·73, 95 per cent c.i. 6·03 to 26·89) and the feeling of being involved in the decision‐making process (OR 2·56, 1·14 to 5·76) remained strong independent predictors of IBR despite adjustment for socioeconomic factors. Importantly, responders to the survey represented a relatively young and wealthy population with a lower tumour burden. Conclusion Several socioeconomic factors independently influence IBR rates; however, patient‐reported information and involvement in the surgical decision‐making process remain independent predictors for the likelihood of having IBR.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50260
work_keys_str_mv AT afrisell influenceofsocioeconomicstatusonimmediatebreastreconstructionratepatientinformationandinvolvementinsurgicaldecisionmaking
AT jlagergren influenceofsocioeconomicstatusonimmediatebreastreconstructionratepatientinformationandinvolvementinsurgicaldecisionmaking
AT mhalle influenceofsocioeconomicstatusonimmediatebreastreconstructionratepatientinformationandinvolvementinsurgicaldecisionmaking
AT jdeboniface influenceofsocioeconomicstatusonimmediatebreastreconstructionratepatientinformationandinvolvementinsurgicaldecisionmaking
_version_ 1721569154975137792