Partial nephrectomy using porcine small intestinal submucosa

• Main Authors: Schnoeller Thomas J, de Petriconi Robert, Hefty Robert, Jentzmik Florian, Waalkes Sandra, Zengerling Friedemann, Schrader Mark, Schrader Andres J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2011-10-01
• Series: World Journal of Surgical Oncology
• Subjects: renal cell carcinoma; nephron-sparing surgery; urinoma; postoperative hemorrhage; complications
• Online Access: http://www.wjso.com/content/9/1/126

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Whenever technically feasible and oncologically justified, nephron-sparing surgery is the current standard of care for localized renal cell carcinomas (RCC). The main complications of partial nephrectomy, especially for large and centrally located tumors, are urinary leakage and parenchymal bleeding. We prospectively evaluated the pros and cons of using porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS, Surgisis^®) to close the renal defect after nephron-sparing surgery.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used Surgisis^®(Cook medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) to secure and compress the capsular defect after tumor resection in 123 patients submitted to 129 partial nephrectomies between August 2003 and February 2011.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The median tumor size was 3.7 cm (range 1.1-13.0 cm). Procedures were performed with cold ischemia in 24 cases (18.2%), with warm ischemia in 46 (35.6%), and without ischemia in 59 cases (44.8%). In the total group of patients, 4 (3.1%) developed urinary fistula, and only 2 (1.6%) required postoperative transfusions due to hemorrhage after the application of the small intestinal submucosa membrane.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Small intestinal submucosa is an easy-to-use biomaterial for preventing complications such as postoperative bleeding and urinary fistula in nephron-sparing surgery, especially in cases where tumor excision causes significant renal capsular and/or renal pelvic defects.</p>