Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations

Abstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins, Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty, Linda Ehrlich-Jones, Deborah Crown, Rachel A. Bond, Marc H. Applebaum, Arun Jayaraman, Catherine Furbish, Gail Forrest, Edelle Field-Fote, Allen W. Heinemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9
id doaj-d0e296e9c933479181a8a0cc01aa3f4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0e296e9c933479181a8a0cc01aa3f4f2020-11-25T03:37:43ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032020-09-0117111010.1186/s12984-020-00752-9Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendationsDominique Kinnett-Hopkins0Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty1Linda Ehrlich-Jones2Deborah Crown3Rachel A. Bond4Marc H. Applebaum5Arun Jayaraman6Catherine Furbish7Gail Forrest8Edelle Field-Fote9Allen W. Heinemann10Northwestern UniversityShirley Ryan AbilityLabNorthwestern UniversityShirley Ryan AbilityLabShirley Ryan AbilityLabNorthwestern UniversityNorthwestern UniversityShepherd CenterKessler FoundationShepherd CenterNorthwestern UniversityAbstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. Methods Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. Results Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. Conclusions The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9Outcome, rehabilitationFocus groupsAssistive technology, locomotor training
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins
Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty
Linda Ehrlich-Jones
Deborah Crown
Rachel A. Bond
Marc H. Applebaum
Arun Jayaraman
Catherine Furbish
Gail Forrest
Edelle Field-Fote
Allen W. Heinemann
spellingShingle Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins
Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty
Linda Ehrlich-Jones
Deborah Crown
Rachel A. Bond
Marc H. Applebaum
Arun Jayaraman
Catherine Furbish
Gail Forrest
Edelle Field-Fote
Allen W. Heinemann
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Outcome, rehabilitation
Focus groups
Assistive technology, locomotor training
author_facet Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins
Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty
Linda Ehrlich-Jones
Deborah Crown
Rachel A. Bond
Marc H. Applebaum
Arun Jayaraman
Catherine Furbish
Gail Forrest
Edelle Field-Fote
Allen W. Heinemann
author_sort Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins
title Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_short Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_full Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_fullStr Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_sort users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
publisher BMC
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
issn 1743-0003
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. Methods Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. Results Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. Conclusions The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations.
topic Outcome, rehabilitation
Focus groups
Assistive technology, locomotor training
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dominiquekinnetthopkins userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT chaithanyakmummidisetty userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT lindaehrlichjones userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT deborahcrown userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT rachelabond userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT marchapplebaum userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT arunjayaraman userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT catherinefurbish userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT gailforrest userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT edellefieldfote userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT allenwheinemann userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
_version_ 1724544350791139328