Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
Abstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 |
id |
doaj-d0e296e9c933479181a8a0cc01aa3f4f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0e296e9c933479181a8a0cc01aa3f4f2020-11-25T03:37:43ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032020-09-0117111010.1186/s12984-020-00752-9Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendationsDominique Kinnett-Hopkins0Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty1Linda Ehrlich-Jones2Deborah Crown3Rachel A. Bond4Marc H. Applebaum5Arun Jayaraman6Catherine Furbish7Gail Forrest8Edelle Field-Fote9Allen W. Heinemann10Northwestern UniversityShirley Ryan AbilityLabNorthwestern UniversityShirley Ryan AbilityLabShirley Ryan AbilityLabNorthwestern UniversityNorthwestern UniversityShepherd CenterKessler FoundationShepherd CenterNorthwestern UniversityAbstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. Methods Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. Results Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. Conclusions The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9Outcome, rehabilitationFocus groupsAssistive technology, locomotor training |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty Linda Ehrlich-Jones Deborah Crown Rachel A. Bond Marc H. Applebaum Arun Jayaraman Catherine Furbish Gail Forrest Edelle Field-Fote Allen W. Heinemann |
spellingShingle |
Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty Linda Ehrlich-Jones Deborah Crown Rachel A. Bond Marc H. Applebaum Arun Jayaraman Catherine Furbish Gail Forrest Edelle Field-Fote Allen W. Heinemann Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Outcome, rehabilitation Focus groups Assistive technology, locomotor training |
author_facet |
Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty Linda Ehrlich-Jones Deborah Crown Rachel A. Bond Marc H. Applebaum Arun Jayaraman Catherine Furbish Gail Forrest Edelle Field-Fote Allen W. Heinemann |
author_sort |
Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins |
title |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_short |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_full |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_fullStr |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_sort |
users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
issn |
1743-0003 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. Methods Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. Results Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. Conclusions The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations. |
topic |
Outcome, rehabilitation Focus groups Assistive technology, locomotor training |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dominiquekinnetthopkins userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT chaithanyakmummidisetty userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT lindaehrlichjones userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT deborahcrown userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT rachelabond userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT marchapplebaum userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT arunjayaraman userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT catherinefurbish userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT gailforrest userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT edellefieldfote userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT allenwheinemann userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations |
_version_ |
1724544350791139328 |