Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.

<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Tono-Pen using Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover in human eyes.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a cross-sectional, experimental study. A gas-sterilized, polyethylen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pukkapol Suvannachart, Somkiat Asawaphureekorn, Sunee Chansangpetch, Abhibol Inobhas, Krit Pongpirul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239875
id doaj-d0dfc90bab7144bc94cb8a5ecf2fc888
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0dfc90bab7144bc94cb8a5ecf2fc8882021-03-04T11:12:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023987510.1371/journal.pone.0239875Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.Pukkapol SuvannachartSomkiat AsawaphureekornSunee ChansangpetchAbhibol InobhasKrit Pongpirul<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Tono-Pen using Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover in human eyes.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a cross-sectional, experimental study. A gas-sterilized, polyethylene wrap was used as an alternative for Tono-Pen tip cover. For the right eye, 4 measurements using polyethylene wrap tip cover were done by two examiners (A and B) in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility. For the left eye, 4 measurements were done by examiner A using both polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and agreement. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used in all analyses. Cost minimization analysis was evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>For examiner A, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.34, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were -3.04 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93 in the right eyes. As for the left eyes, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.33, 95% LOA were -3.01 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93. For examiner B, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.02, 95% LOA were -2.88 to 2.83, and ICC was 0.92. The inter-observer reproducibility of polyethylene wrap tip cover was 0.36, 95% LOA were -3.34 to 4.07, and ICC was 0.90. The repeatability of Ocufilm was -0.42, 95% LOA were -2.75 to 1.91, and ICC was 0.95. The agreement of polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm was -0.71, 95% LOA were -5.18 to 3.76, and ICC was 0.83. There were no allergic reactions or serious complications. From the cost minimization analysis, the local cost for polyethylene tip cover was approximately 8 times lower compared to Ocufilm.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Tono-pen with Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover were used to measure the intraocular pressure. The polyethylene wrap tip cover demonstrated acceptable repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement with Ocufilm in normotensive eyes, and had a good safety profile.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239875
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pukkapol Suvannachart
Somkiat Asawaphureekorn
Sunee Chansangpetch
Abhibol Inobhas
Krit Pongpirul
spellingShingle Pukkapol Suvannachart
Somkiat Asawaphureekorn
Sunee Chansangpetch
Abhibol Inobhas
Krit Pongpirul
Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Pukkapol Suvannachart
Somkiat Asawaphureekorn
Sunee Chansangpetch
Abhibol Inobhas
Krit Pongpirul
author_sort Pukkapol Suvannachart
title Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
title_short Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
title_full Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
title_fullStr Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
title_sort repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of tono-pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Tono-Pen using Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover in human eyes.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a cross-sectional, experimental study. A gas-sterilized, polyethylene wrap was used as an alternative for Tono-Pen tip cover. For the right eye, 4 measurements using polyethylene wrap tip cover were done by two examiners (A and B) in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility. For the left eye, 4 measurements were done by examiner A using both polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and agreement. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used in all analyses. Cost minimization analysis was evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>For examiner A, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.34, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were -3.04 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93 in the right eyes. As for the left eyes, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.33, 95% LOA were -3.01 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93. For examiner B, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.02, 95% LOA were -2.88 to 2.83, and ICC was 0.92. The inter-observer reproducibility of polyethylene wrap tip cover was 0.36, 95% LOA were -3.34 to 4.07, and ICC was 0.90. The repeatability of Ocufilm was -0.42, 95% LOA were -2.75 to 1.91, and ICC was 0.95. The agreement of polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm was -0.71, 95% LOA were -5.18 to 3.76, and ICC was 0.83. There were no allergic reactions or serious complications. From the cost minimization analysis, the local cost for polyethylene tip cover was approximately 8 times lower compared to Ocufilm.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Tono-pen with Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover were used to measure the intraocular pressure. The polyethylene wrap tip cover demonstrated acceptable repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement with Ocufilm in normotensive eyes, and had a good safety profile.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239875
work_keys_str_mv AT pukkapolsuvannachart repeatabilityreproducibilityagreementandsafetyoftonopentipcoverforintraocularmeasurementusinglatexandpolyethylenewrap
AT somkiatasawaphureekorn repeatabilityreproducibilityagreementandsafetyoftonopentipcoverforintraocularmeasurementusinglatexandpolyethylenewrap
AT suneechansangpetch repeatabilityreproducibilityagreementandsafetyoftonopentipcoverforintraocularmeasurementusinglatexandpolyethylenewrap
AT abhibolinobhas repeatabilityreproducibilityagreementandsafetyoftonopentipcoverforintraocularmeasurementusinglatexandpolyethylenewrap
AT kritpongpirul repeatabilityreproducibilityagreementandsafetyoftonopentipcoverforintraocularmeasurementusinglatexandpolyethylenewrap
_version_ 1714804565179629568