Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?

The 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Éditions en environnement VertigO 2019-10-01
Series:VertigO
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/25651
id doaj-d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f2021-10-05T12:32:46ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422019-10-0119210.4000/vertigo.25651Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?Marianne Ollivier-TrigaloThe 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies on the work of a Committee for Ecological Taxation (CFE), which we examined in order to understand under what conditions the introduction of the carbon base in TICPE was developed. On this empirical basis (numerous writings by the CFE and interviews with members of the committee), the purpose of this article is to highlight an interdependence between taxation and energy policy that the outcome of this work shows, reflected in the vote on the TICPE reform. Our analysis highlights how CFE members have had to deal with the rules and formats imposed by taxation. These tax rules are reflected in the choice to go through TICPE, which responds to a double injunction : on the one hand, the efficiency injunction – a tax is above all a revenue ; and on the other hand, the injunction not to create a new tax. The choice to reform TICPE has several characteristics that have a public policy meaning. The mobilisation of a tax instrument has led to the use of tax switching arguments – a tax transition. At the same time, focusing on fossil fuel consumption by introducing the consideration of CO2 emissions (including fuels) has led to exchanges on the search for energy efficiency – an energy transition. Of course, reality does not choose but, on the contrary, mixes the two orientations, making them interdependent.http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/25651ecological taxationcarbon taxdiesel/gasoline tax differentialsTICPEenergy policyclimate policy
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
spellingShingle Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
VertigO
ecological taxation
carbon tax
diesel/gasoline tax differentials
TICPE
energy policy
climate policy
author_facet Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
author_sort Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
title Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_short Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_full Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_fullStr Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_full_unstemmed Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_sort écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
publisher Éditions en environnement VertigO
series VertigO
issn 1492-8442
publishDate 2019-10-01
description The 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies on the work of a Committee for Ecological Taxation (CFE), which we examined in order to understand under what conditions the introduction of the carbon base in TICPE was developed. On this empirical basis (numerous writings by the CFE and interviews with members of the committee), the purpose of this article is to highlight an interdependence between taxation and energy policy that the outcome of this work shows, reflected in the vote on the TICPE reform. Our analysis highlights how CFE members have had to deal with the rules and formats imposed by taxation. These tax rules are reflected in the choice to go through TICPE, which responds to a double injunction : on the one hand, the efficiency injunction – a tax is above all a revenue ; and on the other hand, the injunction not to create a new tax. The choice to reform TICPE has several characteristics that have a public policy meaning. The mobilisation of a tax instrument has led to the use of tax switching arguments – a tax transition. At the same time, focusing on fossil fuel consumption by introducing the consideration of CO2 emissions (including fuels) has led to exchanges on the search for energy efficiency – an energy transition. Of course, reality does not choose but, on the contrary, mixes the two orientations, making them interdependent.
topic ecological taxation
carbon tax
diesel/gasoline tax differentials
TICPE
energy policy
climate policy
url http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/25651
work_keys_str_mv AT marianneolliviertrigalo ecologieetfiscaliteconvergencedesluttes
_version_ 1716843035078164480