Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency

This work compares the effect of a monopole antenna without cooling unit on a biological tissue and a monopole antenna with cooling unit. Computer simulation was done using a computer software named COMSOL MultiphysicsTM, input power was varied from 10W to 120W, with an interval of 10W, at different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olumuyiwa Adewumi, Okechukwu Agbasi, Oluwanifesii Fatile
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mehmet Akif Ersoy University 2019-12-01
Series:Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeusabed/issue/50554/590456?publisher=mehmetakif
id doaj-d0d27156fd33440099e25655a2badfb6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0d27156fd33440099e25655a2badfb62020-11-25T02:05:43ZengMehmet Akif Ersoy UniversityMehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi2148-28372019-12-0172415410.24998/maeusabed.590456273Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation EfficiencyOlumuyiwa AdewumiOkechukwu AgbasiOluwanifesii FatileThis work compares the effect of a monopole antenna without cooling unit on a biological tissue and a monopole antenna with cooling unit. Computer simulation was done using a computer software named COMSOL MultiphysicsTM, input power was varied from 10W to 120W, with an interval of 10W, at different times, from 60s to 120s at an interval of 60s. It was observed that the diameter of the lowest power (20W) decreased by -17.2% at 5mins, the length decreased by -32.9% and aspect ratio for the two antennas increased by 23.40%. For medium power (60W), at 5mins, the diameter decreased by -9.89%, length decreased by -37.9%, and aspect ratio decreased by 45.24%. The p-value obtained from diameter for low power showed no significant difference for ablation without water cool (p > 0.005), but showed significant difference with water cool (p < 0.005), diameter for medium power showed no significant difference, p > 0.005 in both simulations, there was no statistically significant difference in the diameter for high power (110W and 120W) for both simulations, p-value > 0.005. The result showed that inclusion of cooling unit reduced backward heating of microwave antenna, ablation length, and ablation diameter of simulated tissue.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeusabed/issue/50554/590456?publisher=mehmetakifaspect ratioclosed loopmicrowave ablationsignificant difference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olumuyiwa Adewumi
Okechukwu Agbasi
Oluwanifesii Fatile
spellingShingle Olumuyiwa Adewumi
Okechukwu Agbasi
Oluwanifesii Fatile
Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
aspect ratio
closed loop
microwave ablation
significant difference
author_facet Olumuyiwa Adewumi
Okechukwu Agbasi
Oluwanifesii Fatile
author_sort Olumuyiwa Adewumi
title Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
title_short Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
title_full Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
title_fullStr Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Water-Cooled Loop Monopole Antenna on Microwave Ablation Efficiency
title_sort effect of water-cooled loop monopole antenna on microwave ablation efficiency
publisher Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
series Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi
issn 2148-2837
publishDate 2019-12-01
description This work compares the effect of a monopole antenna without cooling unit on a biological tissue and a monopole antenna with cooling unit. Computer simulation was done using a computer software named COMSOL MultiphysicsTM, input power was varied from 10W to 120W, with an interval of 10W, at different times, from 60s to 120s at an interval of 60s. It was observed that the diameter of the lowest power (20W) decreased by -17.2% at 5mins, the length decreased by -32.9% and aspect ratio for the two antennas increased by 23.40%. For medium power (60W), at 5mins, the diameter decreased by -9.89%, length decreased by -37.9%, and aspect ratio decreased by 45.24%. The p-value obtained from diameter for low power showed no significant difference for ablation without water cool (p > 0.005), but showed significant difference with water cool (p < 0.005), diameter for medium power showed no significant difference, p > 0.005 in both simulations, there was no statistically significant difference in the diameter for high power (110W and 120W) for both simulations, p-value > 0.005. The result showed that inclusion of cooling unit reduced backward heating of microwave antenna, ablation length, and ablation diameter of simulated tissue.
topic aspect ratio
closed loop
microwave ablation
significant difference
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeusabed/issue/50554/590456?publisher=mehmetakif
work_keys_str_mv AT olumuyiwaadewumi effectofwatercooledloopmonopoleantennaonmicrowaveablationefficiency
AT okechukwuagbasi effectofwatercooledloopmonopoleantennaonmicrowaveablationefficiency
AT oluwanifesiifatile effectofwatercooledloopmonopoleantennaonmicrowaveablationefficiency
_version_ 1724937448123793408