Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks
ABSTRACTIntroduction: Cancer is caused by genetic abnormalities, such as mutation of ontogenesis or tumor suppressor genes which alter downstream signaling pathways and protein-protein interactions. Comparison of protein interactions in cancerous and normal cells can be of help in mechanisms of dise...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Iran University of Medical Sciences
2010-11-01
|
Series: | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-9&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
id |
doaj-d0cee8c40ed044de9dd00e090861dbb7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0cee8c40ed044de9dd00e090861dbb72020-11-25T00:21:53ZengIran University of Medical SciencesBasic and Clinical Neuroscience2008-126X2228-74422010-11-01214450Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction NetworksMitra Mirzarezaee0Babak N. Araabi1Mehdi Sadeghi2 ABSTRACTIntroduction: Cancer is caused by genetic abnormalities, such as mutation of ontogenesis or tumor suppressor genes which alter downstream signaling pathways and protein-protein interactions. Comparison of protein interactions in cancerous and normal cells can be of help in mechanisms of disease diagnoses and treatments. Methods: We constructed protein interaction networks of cancerous and normal cells. These protein interaction networks are constructed using gene-expression profiles measured from different samples of cancerous and normal tissues from four different parts of the body including colon, prostate, lung, and central nervous system. We used pattern recognition techniques to construct these networks. We calculated ten graph related parameters including closeness centrality, graph diameter, index of aggregation, entropy of edge distribution, connectivity, number of edges divided by the number of vertices, entropy, graph centrality, sum of the wiener number, and modified vertex distance numbers for each of the cancerous and normal protein interaction networks. We have also compared number of edges and hubs of the both cancerous and normal resultant protein interaction networks. Results and Discussion: Our results show that in the studied tissue samples, effective normal protein interaction networks are denser in number of edges and hubs compared with their corresponding effective cancerous protein interaction networks. Number of hubs in effective cancerous protein interaction networks decreases dramatically in comparison with normal tissues. This can be used as a symptom for identification of cancerous tissues.http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-9&slc_lang=en&sid=1CancerProtein InteractionNetwork. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mitra Mirzarezaee Babak N. Araabi Mehdi Sadeghi |
spellingShingle |
Mitra Mirzarezaee Babak N. Araabi Mehdi Sadeghi Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Cancer Protein Interaction Network. |
author_facet |
Mitra Mirzarezaee Babak N. Araabi Mehdi Sadeghi |
author_sort |
Mitra Mirzarezaee |
title |
Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks |
title_short |
Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks |
title_full |
Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Hubs in Effective Normal and Tumor Protein Interaction Networks |
title_sort |
comparison of hubs in effective normal and tumor protein interaction networks |
publisher |
Iran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
issn |
2008-126X 2228-7442 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
ABSTRACTIntroduction: Cancer is caused by genetic abnormalities, such as mutation of ontogenesis or tumor suppressor genes which alter downstream signaling pathways and protein-protein interactions. Comparison of protein interactions in cancerous and normal cells can be of help in mechanisms of disease diagnoses and treatments. Methods: We constructed protein interaction networks of cancerous and normal cells. These protein interaction networks are constructed using gene-expression profiles measured from different samples of cancerous and normal tissues from four different parts of the body including colon, prostate, lung, and central nervous system. We used pattern recognition techniques to construct these networks. We calculated ten graph related parameters including closeness centrality, graph diameter, index of aggregation, entropy of edge distribution, connectivity, number of edges divided by the number of vertices, entropy, graph centrality, sum of the wiener number, and modified vertex distance numbers for each of the cancerous and normal protein interaction networks. We have also compared number of edges and hubs of the both cancerous and normal resultant protein interaction networks. Results and Discussion: Our results show that in the studied tissue samples, effective normal protein interaction networks are denser in number of edges and hubs compared with their corresponding effective cancerous protein interaction networks. Number of hubs in effective cancerous protein interaction networks decreases dramatically in comparison with normal tissues. This can be used as a symptom for identification of cancerous tissues. |
topic |
Cancer Protein Interaction Network. |
url |
http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-9&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mitramirzarezaee comparisonofhubsineffectivenormalandtumorproteininteractionnetworks AT babaknaraabi comparisonofhubsineffectivenormalandtumorproteininteractionnetworks AT mehdisadeghi comparisonofhubsineffectivenormalandtumorproteininteractionnetworks |
_version_ |
1725360822073425920 |