Assessing Quality in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Study of Novice Rater Training
This study investigated performance variability when graduate students critically appraised original studies from a systematic review. Fourteen doctoral students from different academic programs, with no systematic review experience, received training on the Methodological Quality Questionnaire (MQQ...
Main Authors: | Sandra Acosta, Tiberio Garza, Hsien-Yuan Hsu, Patricia Goodson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-07-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020939530 |
Similar Items
-
Ultrasound Imaging Analysis of the Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Echo Intensity: Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Novice and an Experienced Rater
by: Maryse Fortin, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor—Third Edition
by: Aida Carballo-Fazanes, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Assisting Novice Raters in Addressing the In-Between Scores When Rating Writing
by: Greer, Brittney
Published: (2013) -
Item-level and Composite-level Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screen™ Scores Following Condensed Training in Novice Raters
by: Brent A Harper, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Training of merit raters
by: Dyer, Joseph Walsh
Published: (2018)