Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI clo...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299 |
id |
doaj-d0c288ae48ed40b988d4eb3badea1aa2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0c288ae48ed40b988d4eb3badea1aa22020-11-24T23:37:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEurasian Journal of Pulmonology 2148-36202148-54022016-12-0118312713210.5152/ejp.2016.80299Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous VentilationŞenay Yılmaz0Müge Aydoğdu1Gül Gürsel2Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, TurkeyDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyObjective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI closest to the values calculated in spontaneous ventilation (SV). Methods: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm H2O / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73±10 years. RSBI did not differ significantly between SV and other combinations. The best correlation with SV was found with 5 cm H2O PSV-0 cm H2O PEEP (p=0.0001, r=0.719) and the worst with 0 cm H2O PSV-5 cm H2O PEEP. RSBI showed no predictive value for weaning success. Respiration rate (f) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f≤27 was considered as a predictive factor for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) success (PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 93%, specificity 63%, PSV 15 cm H2O-PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 81%, specificity 75%). Conclusion: There was a good correlation between RSBI measured by T-tube and different pressure combinations. http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299Rapid shallow breathing indexmechanical ventilation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Şenay Yılmaz Müge Aydoğdu Gül Gürsel |
spellingShingle |
Şenay Yılmaz Müge Aydoğdu Gül Gürsel Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology Rapid shallow breathing index mechanical ventilation |
author_facet |
Şenay Yılmaz Müge Aydoğdu Gül Gürsel |
author_sort |
Şenay Yılmaz |
title |
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation |
title_short |
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation |
title_full |
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation |
title_fullStr |
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation |
title_sort |
determining the pressure combination during mechanical ventilation that is best compatible with the rapid shallow breathing index calculated in spontaneous ventilation |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology |
issn |
2148-3620 2148-5402 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI closest to the values calculated in spontaneous ventilation (SV).
Methods: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm H2O / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 73±10 years. RSBI did not differ significantly between SV and other combinations. The best correlation with SV was found with 5 cm H2O PSV-0 cm H2O PEEP (p=0.0001, r=0.719) and the worst with 0 cm H2O PSV-5 cm H2O PEEP. RSBI showed no predictive value for weaning success. Respiration rate (f) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f≤27 was considered as a predictive factor for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) success (PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 93%, specificity 63%, PSV 15 cm H2O-PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 81%, specificity 75%).
Conclusion: There was a good correlation between RSBI measured by T-tube and different pressure combinations.
|
topic |
Rapid shallow breathing index mechanical ventilation |
url |
http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT senayyılmaz determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation AT mugeaydogdu determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation AT gulgursel determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation |
_version_ |
1725520969466904576 |