Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation

Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI clo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Şenay Yılmaz, Müge Aydoğdu, Gül Gürsel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-12-01
Series:Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299
id doaj-d0c288ae48ed40b988d4eb3badea1aa2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0c288ae48ed40b988d4eb3badea1aa22020-11-24T23:37:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEurasian Journal of Pulmonology 2148-36202148-54022016-12-0118312713210.5152/ejp.2016.80299Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous VentilationŞenay Yılmaz0Müge Aydoğdu1Gül Gürsel2Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University School of Medicine, Eskişehir, TurkeyDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyObjective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI closest to the values calculated in spontaneous ventilation (SV). Methods: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm H2O / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73±10 years. RSBI did not differ significantly between SV and other combinations. The best correlation with SV was found with 5 cm H2O PSV-0 cm H2O PEEP (p=0.0001, r=0.719) and the worst with 0 cm H2O PSV-5 cm H2O PEEP. RSBI showed no predictive value for weaning success. Respiration rate (f) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f≤27 was considered as a predictive factor for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) success (PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 93%, specificity 63%, PSV 15 cm H2O-PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 81%, specificity 75%). Conclusion: There was a good correlation between RSBI measured by T-tube and different pressure combinations. http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299Rapid shallow breathing indexmechanical ventilation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Şenay Yılmaz
Müge Aydoğdu
Gül Gürsel
spellingShingle Şenay Yılmaz
Müge Aydoğdu
Gül Gürsel
Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Rapid shallow breathing index
mechanical ventilation
author_facet Şenay Yılmaz
Müge Aydoğdu
Gül Gürsel
author_sort Şenay Yılmaz
title Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
title_short Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
title_full Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
title_fullStr Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation
title_sort determining the pressure combination during mechanical ventilation that is best compatible with the rapid shallow breathing index calculated in spontaneous ventilation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
issn 2148-3620
2148-5402
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI closest to the values calculated in spontaneous ventilation (SV). Methods: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm H2O / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73±10 years. RSBI did not differ significantly between SV and other combinations. The best correlation with SV was found with 5 cm H2O PSV-0 cm H2O PEEP (p=0.0001, r=0.719) and the worst with 0 cm H2O PSV-5 cm H2O PEEP. RSBI showed no predictive value for weaning success. Respiration rate (f) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f≤27 was considered as a predictive factor for spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) success (PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 93%, specificity 63%, PSV 15 cm H2O-PEEP 5 cm H2O; sensitivity 81%, specificity 75%). Conclusion: There was a good correlation between RSBI measured by T-tube and different pressure combinations.
topic Rapid shallow breathing index
mechanical ventilation
url http://www.eurasianjpulmonol.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=eurasianjpulmonol&plng=eng&un=EJP-80299
work_keys_str_mv AT senayyılmaz determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation
AT mugeaydogdu determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation
AT gulgursel determiningthepressurecombinationduringmechanicalventilationthatisbestcompatiblewiththerapidshallowbreathingindexcalculatedinspontaneousventilation
_version_ 1725520969466904576