Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research

Abstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole A. Stadnick, Cheryl N. Poth, Timothy C. Guetterman, Joseph J. Gallo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1
id doaj-d0bfb034fc3544a6b078cb2704678a05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0bfb034fc3544a6b078cb2704678a052021-06-20T11:08:36ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-06-012111910.1186/s12913-021-06583-1Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services researchNicole A. Stadnick0Cheryl N. Poth1Timothy C. Guetterman2Joseph J. Gallo3Department of Psychiatry, University of California San DiegoDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of AlbertaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of MichiganMixed Methods Research Training Program, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthAbstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and consultants from the NIH-funded Mixed Methods Research Training Program (MMRTP) for the Health Sciences. This was a cross-sectional study. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to characterize responses and open coding to summarize strategies about eight ethical mixed methods research issues. Respondents completed an online survey to elicit experiences related to eight ethical issues (informed consent, confidentiality, data management, burden, safety, equitable recruitment, communication, and dissemination) and strategies for addressing them. Results Only about one-third of respondents thought their research ethics training helped them plan, conduct, or report mixed methods research. The most frequently occurring ethical issues were participant burden, dissemination and equitable recruitment (> 70% endorsement). Despite occurring frequently, < 50% of respondents rated each ethical issue as challenging. The most challenging ethical issues were related to managing participant burden, communication, and dissemination. Strategies reported to address ethical issues were largely not specific or unique to mixed methods with the exception of strategies to mitigate participant burden and, to a lesser degree, to facilitate equitable recruitment and promote dissemination of project results. Conclusions Mixed methods health researchers reported encountering ethical issues often yet varying levels of difficulty and effectiveness in the strategies used to mitigate ethical issues. This study highlights some of the unique challenges faced by mixed methods researchers to plan for and appropriately respond to arising ethical issues such as managing participant burden and confidentiality across data sources and utilizing effective communication and dissemination strategies particularly when working with a multidisciplinary research team. As one of the first empirical studies to examine mixed methods research ethics, our findings highlight the need for greater attention to ethics in health services mixed methods research and training.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1Mixed methodsResearch ethicsHealth services research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicole A. Stadnick
Cheryl N. Poth
Timothy C. Guetterman
Joseph J. Gallo
spellingShingle Nicole A. Stadnick
Cheryl N. Poth
Timothy C. Guetterman
Joseph J. Gallo
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
BMC Health Services Research
Mixed methods
Research ethics
Health services research
author_facet Nicole A. Stadnick
Cheryl N. Poth
Timothy C. Guetterman
Joseph J. Gallo
author_sort Nicole A. Stadnick
title Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
title_short Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
title_full Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
title_fullStr Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
title_full_unstemmed Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
title_sort advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and consultants from the NIH-funded Mixed Methods Research Training Program (MMRTP) for the Health Sciences. This was a cross-sectional study. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to characterize responses and open coding to summarize strategies about eight ethical mixed methods research issues. Respondents completed an online survey to elicit experiences related to eight ethical issues (informed consent, confidentiality, data management, burden, safety, equitable recruitment, communication, and dissemination) and strategies for addressing them. Results Only about one-third of respondents thought their research ethics training helped them plan, conduct, or report mixed methods research. The most frequently occurring ethical issues were participant burden, dissemination and equitable recruitment (> 70% endorsement). Despite occurring frequently, < 50% of respondents rated each ethical issue as challenging. The most challenging ethical issues were related to managing participant burden, communication, and dissemination. Strategies reported to address ethical issues were largely not specific or unique to mixed methods with the exception of strategies to mitigate participant burden and, to a lesser degree, to facilitate equitable recruitment and promote dissemination of project results. Conclusions Mixed methods health researchers reported encountering ethical issues often yet varying levels of difficulty and effectiveness in the strategies used to mitigate ethical issues. This study highlights some of the unique challenges faced by mixed methods researchers to plan for and appropriately respond to arising ethical issues such as managing participant burden and confidentiality across data sources and utilizing effective communication and dissemination strategies particularly when working with a multidisciplinary research team. As one of the first empirical studies to examine mixed methods research ethics, our findings highlight the need for greater attention to ethics in health services mixed methods research and training.
topic Mixed methods
Research ethics
Health services research
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleastadnick advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch
AT cherylnpoth advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch
AT timothycguetterman advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch
AT josephjgallo advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch
_version_ 1721370498644836352