Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research
Abstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1 |
id |
doaj-d0bfb034fc3544a6b078cb2704678a05 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0bfb034fc3544a6b078cb2704678a052021-06-20T11:08:36ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-06-012111910.1186/s12913-021-06583-1Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services researchNicole A. Stadnick0Cheryl N. Poth1Timothy C. Guetterman2Joseph J. Gallo3Department of Psychiatry, University of California San DiegoDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of AlbertaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of MichiganMixed Methods Research Training Program, Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthAbstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and consultants from the NIH-funded Mixed Methods Research Training Program (MMRTP) for the Health Sciences. This was a cross-sectional study. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to characterize responses and open coding to summarize strategies about eight ethical mixed methods research issues. Respondents completed an online survey to elicit experiences related to eight ethical issues (informed consent, confidentiality, data management, burden, safety, equitable recruitment, communication, and dissemination) and strategies for addressing them. Results Only about one-third of respondents thought their research ethics training helped them plan, conduct, or report mixed methods research. The most frequently occurring ethical issues were participant burden, dissemination and equitable recruitment (> 70% endorsement). Despite occurring frequently, < 50% of respondents rated each ethical issue as challenging. The most challenging ethical issues were related to managing participant burden, communication, and dissemination. Strategies reported to address ethical issues were largely not specific or unique to mixed methods with the exception of strategies to mitigate participant burden and, to a lesser degree, to facilitate equitable recruitment and promote dissemination of project results. Conclusions Mixed methods health researchers reported encountering ethical issues often yet varying levels of difficulty and effectiveness in the strategies used to mitigate ethical issues. This study highlights some of the unique challenges faced by mixed methods researchers to plan for and appropriately respond to arising ethical issues such as managing participant burden and confidentiality across data sources and utilizing effective communication and dissemination strategies particularly when working with a multidisciplinary research team. As one of the first empirical studies to examine mixed methods research ethics, our findings highlight the need for greater attention to ethics in health services mixed methods research and training.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1Mixed methodsResearch ethicsHealth services research |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicole A. Stadnick Cheryl N. Poth Timothy C. Guetterman Joseph J. Gallo |
spellingShingle |
Nicole A. Stadnick Cheryl N. Poth Timothy C. Guetterman Joseph J. Gallo Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research BMC Health Services Research Mixed methods Research ethics Health services research |
author_facet |
Nicole A. Stadnick Cheryl N. Poth Timothy C. Guetterman Joseph J. Gallo |
author_sort |
Nicole A. Stadnick |
title |
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
title_short |
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
title_full |
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
title_fullStr |
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
title_sort |
advancing discussion of ethics in mixed methods health services research |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background To describe the ethical issues and experiences of scientists conducting mixed methods health services research and to advance empirical and conceptual discussion on ethical integrity in mixed methods health research. Methods The study was conducted with 64 scholars, faculty and consultants from the NIH-funded Mixed Methods Research Training Program (MMRTP) for the Health Sciences. This was a cross-sectional study. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to characterize responses and open coding to summarize strategies about eight ethical mixed methods research issues. Respondents completed an online survey to elicit experiences related to eight ethical issues (informed consent, confidentiality, data management, burden, safety, equitable recruitment, communication, and dissemination) and strategies for addressing them. Results Only about one-third of respondents thought their research ethics training helped them plan, conduct, or report mixed methods research. The most frequently occurring ethical issues were participant burden, dissemination and equitable recruitment (> 70% endorsement). Despite occurring frequently, < 50% of respondents rated each ethical issue as challenging. The most challenging ethical issues were related to managing participant burden, communication, and dissemination. Strategies reported to address ethical issues were largely not specific or unique to mixed methods with the exception of strategies to mitigate participant burden and, to a lesser degree, to facilitate equitable recruitment and promote dissemination of project results. Conclusions Mixed methods health researchers reported encountering ethical issues often yet varying levels of difficulty and effectiveness in the strategies used to mitigate ethical issues. This study highlights some of the unique challenges faced by mixed methods researchers to plan for and appropriately respond to arising ethical issues such as managing participant burden and confidentiality across data sources and utilizing effective communication and dissemination strategies particularly when working with a multidisciplinary research team. As one of the first empirical studies to examine mixed methods research ethics, our findings highlight the need for greater attention to ethics in health services mixed methods research and training. |
topic |
Mixed methods Research ethics Health services research |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06583-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicoleastadnick advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch AT cherylnpoth advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch AT timothycguetterman advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch AT josephjgallo advancingdiscussionofethicsinmixedmethodshealthservicesresearch |
_version_ |
1721370498644836352 |