Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice

The article investigates problems of release from serving the punishment with probation for heavy sordid crimes against property. Theoretical and applied problems of accounting of the facts of the case by court are covered at the solution of a question of a possibility of the correction condemned f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oleksii Gorokh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy 2018-12-01
Series:Наукові записки НаУКМА: Юридичні науки
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nrplaw.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/153130
id doaj-d0ad2bd3f7644c4ba637b21588034f06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0ad2bd3f7644c4ba637b21588034f062021-07-08T11:08:21ZengNational University of Kyiv-Mohyla AcademyНаукові записки НаУКМА: Юридичні науки 2617-26072018-12-0118492https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.84-92Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court PracticeOleksii Gorokh0National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy The article investigates problems of release from serving the punishment with probation for heavy sordid crimes against property. Theoretical and applied problems of accounting of the facts of the case by court are covered at the solution of a question of a possibility of the correction condemned for these crimes without serving the imposed sentence. It is noted that one of the most widespread criminal and legal measures applied for property crimes on an equal basis with punishment is release from serving the punishment with probation. On the basis of studying special literature, a conclusion is drawn that problems of application of release from serving the punishment with probation for certain types of crimes are investigated insufficiently. 1,576 judgments made by courts of Ukraine during 2006–2018, in which cases concerning convicts for heavy sordid crimes against property (in particular, according to the p. 4 of Art. 185, the p. 3 of Art. 186, the p. 2 of Art. 187, the p. 3 of Art. 190, the p. 2 of Art. 289, the p. 3 of Art. 297 of Criminal Code) resolved an issue of application of Art. 75 of CC, are studied for this purpose. Establishment of circumstances by which we characterize the seriousness of crime, the identity of the guilty person, and other facts of the case considered by courts at application (application cancellation) of Art. 75 of Criminal Code in this category of affairs became a result of the carried-out analysis. Studying of the court practice showed that release from serving the punishment with probation for heavy sordid crimes against property is applied mainly to convicts who committed a crime for the first time; in a sober state; did not cause heavy consequences; voluntarily paid sustained losses (eliminated the done harm); carried out at crime execution in partnership in an inactive (minor) role, without application of excessive violence to the victim; admitted guilt and frankly regretted; actively promoted crime detection; work (training) is positively characterized at the place of residence; work (study); have family and also support minor children or disabled parents; suffer from different diseases. Examples from court practice showed law enforcement problems in this sphere.http://nrplaw.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/153130sordid crimes against propertyheavy sordid crimes against propertyrelease from serving of punishment with the probationrelease from serving of punishment with the probation for heavy sordid crimes against property
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleksii Gorokh
spellingShingle Oleksii Gorokh
Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
Наукові записки НаУКМА: Юридичні науки
sordid crimes against property
heavy sordid crimes against property
release from serving of punishment with the probation
release from serving of punishment with the probation for heavy sordid crimes against property
author_facet Oleksii Gorokh
author_sort Oleksii Gorokh
title Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
title_short Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
title_full Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
title_fullStr Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
title_full_unstemmed Release from Serving of Punishment with Probation for Heavy Crowd Crimes Against Property: Problems of Court Practice
title_sort release from serving of punishment with probation for heavy crowd crimes against property: problems of court practice
publisher National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy
series Наукові записки НаУКМА: Юридичні науки
issn 2617-2607
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The article investigates problems of release from serving the punishment with probation for heavy sordid crimes against property. Theoretical and applied problems of accounting of the facts of the case by court are covered at the solution of a question of a possibility of the correction condemned for these crimes without serving the imposed sentence. It is noted that one of the most widespread criminal and legal measures applied for property crimes on an equal basis with punishment is release from serving the punishment with probation. On the basis of studying special literature, a conclusion is drawn that problems of application of release from serving the punishment with probation for certain types of crimes are investigated insufficiently. 1,576 judgments made by courts of Ukraine during 2006–2018, in which cases concerning convicts for heavy sordid crimes against property (in particular, according to the p. 4 of Art. 185, the p. 3 of Art. 186, the p. 2 of Art. 187, the p. 3 of Art. 190, the p. 2 of Art. 289, the p. 3 of Art. 297 of Criminal Code) resolved an issue of application of Art. 75 of CC, are studied for this purpose. Establishment of circumstances by which we characterize the seriousness of crime, the identity of the guilty person, and other facts of the case considered by courts at application (application cancellation) of Art. 75 of Criminal Code in this category of affairs became a result of the carried-out analysis. Studying of the court practice showed that release from serving the punishment with probation for heavy sordid crimes against property is applied mainly to convicts who committed a crime for the first time; in a sober state; did not cause heavy consequences; voluntarily paid sustained losses (eliminated the done harm); carried out at crime execution in partnership in an inactive (minor) role, without application of excessive violence to the victim; admitted guilt and frankly regretted; actively promoted crime detection; work (training) is positively characterized at the place of residence; work (study); have family and also support minor children or disabled parents; suffer from different diseases. Examples from court practice showed law enforcement problems in this sphere.
topic sordid crimes against property
heavy sordid crimes against property
release from serving of punishment with the probation
release from serving of punishment with the probation for heavy sordid crimes against property
url http://nrplaw.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/153130
work_keys_str_mv AT oleksiigorokh releasefromservingofpunishmentwithprobationforheavycrowdcrimesagainstpropertyproblemsofcourtpractice
_version_ 1721313477739413504