Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods

• Main Authors: Newton Mandi, Hofmeyer Anne, Scott Cathie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2007-05-01
• Series: Health Research Policy and Systems
• Online Access: http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/5/1/5

<p>Abstract</p> <p>In the landmark 1990 publication <it>Scholarship Reconsidered</it>, Boyer challenged the 'teaching verses research debates' by advocating for the scholarship of discovery, teaching, integration, and application. The scholarship of discovery considers publications and research as the yardstick in the merit, promotion and tenure system the world over. But this narrow view of scholarship does not fully support the obligations of universities to serve global societies and to improve health and health equity. Mechanisms to report the scholarship of teaching have been developed and adopted by some universities. In this article, we contribute to the less developed areas of scholarship, i.e. integration and application. We firstly situate the scholarship of discovery, teaching, integration and application within the interprofessional and knowledge exchange debates. Second, we propose a means for health science scholars to report the process and outcomes of the scholarship of integration and application with other disciplines, decision-makers and communities. We conclude with recommendations for structural and process change in faculty merit, tenure, and promotion systems so that health science scholars with varied academic portfolios are valued and many forms of academic scholarship are sustained. It is vital academic institutions remain relevant in an era when the production of knowledge is increasingly recognized as a social collaborative activity.</p>