Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation

This paper critically examines the relationship between air pollution and deprivation. We argue that focusing on a particular economic or social model of urban development might lead one to erroneously expect all cities to converge towards a particular universal norm. A naive market sorting model, f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Bailey, Guanpeng Dong, Jon Minton, Gwilym Pryce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/629
id doaj-d07bac1f99d54f2ea3fd424ca38001a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d07bac1f99d54f2ea3fd424ca38001a72020-11-25T00:15:32ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012018-03-0115462910.3390/ijerph15040629ijerph15040629Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and DeprivationNick Bailey0Guanpeng Dong1Jon Minton2Gwilym Pryce3School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UKDepartment of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UKSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UKSheffield Methods Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DP, UKThis paper critically examines the relationship between air pollution and deprivation. We argue that focusing on a particular economic or social model of urban development might lead one to erroneously expect all cities to converge towards a particular universal norm. A naive market sorting model, for example, would predict that poor households will eventually be sorted into high pollution areas, leading to a positive relationship between air pollution and deprivation. If, however, one considers a wider set of theoretical perspectives, the anticipated relationship between air pollution and deprivation becomes more complex and idiosyncratic. Specifically, we argue the relationship between pollution and deprivation can only be made sense of by considering processes of risk perception, path dependency, gentrification and urbanization. Rather than expecting all areas to eventually converge to some universal norm, we should expect the differences in the relationship between air pollution and deprivation across localities to persist. Mindful of these insights, we propose an approach to modeling which does not impose a geographically fixed relationship. Results for Scotland reveal substantial variations in the observed relationships over space and time, supporting our argument.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/629air pollutiongeographically weighted regressionspatiotemporal variationsdeprivation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nick Bailey
Guanpeng Dong
Jon Minton
Gwilym Pryce
spellingShingle Nick Bailey
Guanpeng Dong
Jon Minton
Gwilym Pryce
Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
air pollution
geographically weighted regression
spatiotemporal variations
deprivation
author_facet Nick Bailey
Guanpeng Dong
Jon Minton
Gwilym Pryce
author_sort Nick Bailey
title Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
title_short Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
title_full Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
title_fullStr Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the Relationship between Air Pollution and Deprivation
title_sort reconsidering the relationship between air pollution and deprivation
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2018-03-01
description This paper critically examines the relationship between air pollution and deprivation. We argue that focusing on a particular economic or social model of urban development might lead one to erroneously expect all cities to converge towards a particular universal norm. A naive market sorting model, for example, would predict that poor households will eventually be sorted into high pollution areas, leading to a positive relationship between air pollution and deprivation. If, however, one considers a wider set of theoretical perspectives, the anticipated relationship between air pollution and deprivation becomes more complex and idiosyncratic. Specifically, we argue the relationship between pollution and deprivation can only be made sense of by considering processes of risk perception, path dependency, gentrification and urbanization. Rather than expecting all areas to eventually converge to some universal norm, we should expect the differences in the relationship between air pollution and deprivation across localities to persist. Mindful of these insights, we propose an approach to modeling which does not impose a geographically fixed relationship. Results for Scotland reveal substantial variations in the observed relationships over space and time, supporting our argument.
topic air pollution
geographically weighted regression
spatiotemporal variations
deprivation
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/4/629
work_keys_str_mv AT nickbailey reconsideringtherelationshipbetweenairpollutionanddeprivation
AT guanpengdong reconsideringtherelationshipbetweenairpollutionanddeprivation
AT jonminton reconsideringtherelationshipbetweenairpollutionanddeprivation
AT gwilympryce reconsideringtherelationshipbetweenairpollutionanddeprivation
_version_ 1725386333963157504