The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research

A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedikt Wisniewski, Klaus Zierer, John Hattie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/full
id doaj-d0708ec1b83041839fa99c22b4403c1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0708ec1b83041839fa99c22b4403c1d2020-11-25T02:56:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-01-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087487662The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback ResearchBenedikt Wisniewski0Klaus Zierer1John Hattie2Department of School Pedagogy, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of School Pedagogy, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyMelbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaA meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect (d = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in The power of feedback (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/fullfeedbackstudent learningstudent achievementmeta-analysisteaching
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedikt Wisniewski
Klaus Zierer
John Hattie
spellingShingle Benedikt Wisniewski
Klaus Zierer
John Hattie
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Frontiers in Psychology
feedback
student learning
student achievement
meta-analysis
teaching
author_facet Benedikt Wisniewski
Klaus Zierer
John Hattie
author_sort Benedikt Wisniewski
title The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
title_short The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
title_full The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
title_fullStr The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
title_full_unstemmed The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
title_sort power of feedback revisited: a meta-analysis of educational feedback research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-01-01
description A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect (d = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in The power of feedback (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures.
topic feedback
student learning
student achievement
meta-analysis
teaching
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/full
work_keys_str_mv AT benediktwisniewski thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
AT klauszierer thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
AT johnhattie thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
AT benediktwisniewski poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
AT klauszierer poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
AT johnhattie poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch
_version_ 1724714268487581696