The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synth...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/full |
id |
doaj-d0708ec1b83041839fa99c22b4403c1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d0708ec1b83041839fa99c22b4403c1d2020-11-25T02:56:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-01-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087487662The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback ResearchBenedikt Wisniewski0Klaus Zierer1John Hattie2Department of School Pedagogy, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of School Pedagogy, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, GermanyMelbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, AustraliaA meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect (d = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in The power of feedback (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/fullfeedbackstudent learningstudent achievementmeta-analysisteaching |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Benedikt Wisniewski Klaus Zierer John Hattie |
spellingShingle |
Benedikt Wisniewski Klaus Zierer John Hattie The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research Frontiers in Psychology feedback student learning student achievement meta-analysis teaching |
author_facet |
Benedikt Wisniewski Klaus Zierer John Hattie |
author_sort |
Benedikt Wisniewski |
title |
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research |
title_short |
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research |
title_full |
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research |
title_fullStr |
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research |
title_sort |
power of feedback revisited: a meta-analysis of educational feedback research |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
A meta-analysis (435 studies, k = 994, N > 61,000) of empirical research on the effects of feedback on student learning was conducted with the purpose of replicating and expanding the Visible Learning research (Hattie and Timperley, 2007; Hattie, 2009; Hattie and Zierer, 2019) from meta-synthesis. Overall results based on a random-effects model indicate a medium effect (d = 0.48) of feedback on student learning, but the significant heterogeneity in the data shows that feedback cannot be understood as a single consistent form of treatment. A moderator analysis revealed that the impact is substantially influenced by the information content conveyed. Furthermore, feedback has higher impact on cognitive and motor skills outcomes than on motivational and behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings in the light of the assumptions made in The power of feedback (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). In general, the results suggest that feedback has rightly become a focus of teaching research and practice. However, they also point toward the necessity of interpreting different forms of feedback as independent measures. |
topic |
feedback student learning student achievement meta-analysis teaching |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT benediktwisniewski thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch AT klauszierer thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch AT johnhattie thepoweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch AT benediktwisniewski poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch AT klauszierer poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch AT johnhattie poweroffeedbackrevisitedametaanalysisofeducationalfeedbackresearch |
_version_ |
1724714268487581696 |