Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time
The paper examines evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time in the British House of Commons and in the Australian House of Representatives. It analyses the usage of evasion and hedging, and briefly investigates the relation between these two linguistic phenomena. Moreover...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Linguistica Pragensia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://sites.ff.cuni.cz/linguisticapragensia/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/10/LP_2017-2_Nevrkla_83-95.pdf |
id |
doaj-d06c866f99b742f8aa0bdf2d0eef4f46 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d06c866f99b742f8aa0bdf2d0eef4f462020-11-24T21:38:16ZdeuUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultaLinguistica Pragensia0862-84321805-96352017-10-012728395Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time Lukáš Nevrkla0Charles University, Faculty of Arts, Institute of World HistoryThe paper examines evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time in the British House of Commons and in the Australian House of Representatives. It analyses the usage of evasion and hedging, and briefly investigates the relation between these two linguistic phenomena. Moreover, it seeks to test the methodological approach, and the conclusions reached in the previous research, especially by Alan Partington (2003) and Bruce Fraser (2010), and to provide a comparative perspective on the rhetorical culture and communication conventions in the British and Australian Question Time. https://sites.ff.cuni.cz/linguisticapragensia/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/10/LP_2017-2_Nevrkla_83-95.pdfpragmaticspolitical discoursehedgingevasionparliamentary Question TimeHouse of Commons (United Kingdom)House of Representatives (Australia) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lukáš Nevrkla |
spellingShingle |
Lukáš Nevrkla Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time Linguistica Pragensia pragmatics political discourse hedging evasion parliamentary Question Time House of Commons (United Kingdom) House of Representatives (Australia) |
author_facet |
Lukáš Nevrkla |
author_sort |
Lukáš Nevrkla |
title |
Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time |
title_short |
Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time |
title_full |
Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time |
title_fullStr |
Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time |
title_sort |
evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary question time |
publisher |
Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta |
series |
Linguistica Pragensia |
issn |
0862-8432 1805-9635 |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
The paper examines evasion and hedging in the language of parliamentary Question Time in the British
House of Commons and in the Australian House of Representatives. It analyses the usage of evasion
and hedging, and briefly investigates the relation between these two linguistic phenomena. Moreover,
it seeks to test the methodological approach, and the conclusions reached in the previous research, especially
by Alan Partington (2003) and Bruce Fraser (2010), and to provide a comparative perspective
on the rhetorical culture and communication conventions in the British and Australian Question Time. |
topic |
pragmatics political discourse hedging evasion parliamentary Question Time House of Commons (United Kingdom) House of Representatives (Australia) |
url |
https://sites.ff.cuni.cz/linguisticapragensia/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/10/LP_2017-2_Nevrkla_83-95.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lukasnevrkla evasionandhedginginthelanguageofparliamentaryquestiontime |
_version_ |
1725935086484848640 |