Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
The aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘desi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Estonian |
Published: |
Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum
2009-08-01
|
Series: | Mäetagused |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdf |
id |
doaj-d06af6fd551c44caac5060eb105135da |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d06af6fd551c44caac5060eb105135da2020-11-25T00:35:17ZestEesti Kirjandusmuuseum Mäetagused1406-992X1406-99382009-08-0142123148Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstidesLiina Ootsing-LüeckeThe aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘design’), and the Akkadian word esē ru(m)(‘to draw’, ‘to design’, ‘drawing’, ‘design’ or ‘plan’) are mostly mentioned in a substantive context which encompasses the divine sphere. Gods and kings establish the world order with various ‘designs’ and ‘plans’.The Sumerian phenomenon of me (the ‘divine power’ of gods) which describes god’s essence and is a divine attribute, and the Akkadian term parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’) which encompasses divine ‘order’ and ‘cultic rites’, are both closely connected with the phenomena of ĝiš-hur and esē ru(m). In Sumerian and Akkadian myths and epics, the phrases ‘the plan of heaven and earth’ and ‘the cosmic order’ refer to the actions of gods and kings who always plan or design something substantial. A ‘plan’ is a means of securing power for a king. Gods also have ‘plans’ and ‘designs’ and deliver them to kings in an effort to strengthen and guarantee their reign. Kings have a duty to fulfil the ‘plan’ or ‘regulations’ of the land or kingdom. In Sumerian mythology the phenomenon of ĝiš-hur is connected with the underground aquifer abzu and its master, the god Enki. This understanding is also reflected in the late Babylonian epic of creation, which describes the establishing and securing the universal order. Sumerians and Akkadians also ‘designed’ and ‘drew’ many ‘temple’, ‘town’ and ‘kingdom’ plans, which had only local importance, but the loss of these plans is grieved about in several lamentation compositions. In later bilingual texts, abstract ‘cosmic’ and ‘life’ designs are mentioned. In Babylonian and Assyrian myths the creation of people is described as ‘drawing their shape’, and the same phrase is used in regard to the creation of other creatures and things. In Akkadian mythology the terms ‘plan’ and ‘design’ very often seem to be synonymous with parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’), which is administered by gods and kings. It can be lost in struggles for power and can therefore cause cosmic disorder and imbalance. In Sumerian and Akkadian incantations, primarily in apotropaic rites, the terms ‘magic circle’ or ‘drawing’ or ‘line’ describe a boundary that demons cannot cross. These ceremonial rites probably have a broader meaning: to avoid demons’ interference in the cosmic order which is under the control and patronage of gods. They set up ‘nets’ and ‘traps’ for evil ghosts who have crossed the magic border. The crafty god Enki/Ea mostly draws the magic circle: this phenomenon may be connected with the Sumerian perception about this god as a designer of temple plans.In Babylonian wisdom literature, the “gods’ rites” have already been interpreted from a moral perspective, which refers primarily to man’s attitude towards his personal god. The religious concept of man’s ‘personal god’, who guides him during his whole life and is responsible for his fate, emerged in the Old-Babylonian period in the 2nd millennium BC.http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdfAkkadianAssyriologyhistory of religionmythologyreligious phenomenologySumerian |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Estonian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Liina Ootsing-Lüecke |
spellingShingle |
Liina Ootsing-Lüecke Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides Mäetagused Akkadian Assyriology history of religion mythology religious phenomenology Sumerian |
author_facet |
Liina Ootsing-Lüecke |
author_sort |
Liina Ootsing-Lüecke |
title |
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
title_short |
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
title_full |
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
title_fullStr |
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
title_sort |
mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides |
publisher |
Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum |
series |
Mäetagused |
issn |
1406-992X 1406-9938 |
publishDate |
2009-08-01 |
description |
The aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘design’), and the Akkadian word esē ru(m)(‘to draw’, ‘to design’, ‘drawing’, ‘design’ or ‘plan’) are mostly mentioned in a substantive context which encompasses the divine sphere. Gods and kings establish the world order with various ‘designs’ and ‘plans’.The Sumerian phenomenon of me (the ‘divine power’ of gods) which describes god’s essence and is a divine attribute, and the Akkadian term parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’) which encompasses divine ‘order’ and ‘cultic rites’, are both closely connected with the phenomena of ĝiš-hur and esē ru(m). In Sumerian and Akkadian myths and epics, the phrases ‘the plan of heaven and earth’ and ‘the cosmic order’ refer to the actions of gods and kings who always plan or design something substantial. A ‘plan’ is a means of securing power for a king. Gods also have ‘plans’ and ‘designs’ and deliver them to kings in an effort to strengthen and guarantee their reign. Kings have a duty to fulfil the ‘plan’ or ‘regulations’ of the land or kingdom. In Sumerian mythology the phenomenon of ĝiš-hur is connected with the underground aquifer abzu and its master, the god Enki. This understanding is also reflected in the late Babylonian epic of creation, which describes the establishing and securing the universal order. Sumerians and Akkadians also ‘designed’ and ‘drew’ many ‘temple’, ‘town’ and ‘kingdom’ plans, which had only local importance, but the loss of these plans is grieved about in several lamentation compositions. In later bilingual texts, abstract ‘cosmic’ and ‘life’ designs are mentioned. In Babylonian and Assyrian myths the creation of people is described as ‘drawing their shape’, and the same phrase is used in regard to the creation of other creatures and things. In Akkadian mythology the terms ‘plan’ and ‘design’ very often seem to be synonymous with parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’), which is administered by gods and kings. It can be lost in struggles for power and can therefore cause cosmic disorder and imbalance. In Sumerian and Akkadian incantations, primarily in apotropaic rites, the terms ‘magic circle’ or ‘drawing’ or ‘line’ describe a boundary that demons cannot cross. These ceremonial rites probably have a broader meaning: to avoid demons’ interference in the cosmic order which is under the control and patronage of gods. They set up ‘nets’ and ‘traps’ for evil ghosts who have crossed the magic border. The crafty god Enki/Ea mostly draws the magic circle: this phenomenon may be connected with the Sumerian perception about this god as a designer of temple plans.In Babylonian wisdom literature, the “gods’ rites” have already been interpreted from a moral perspective, which refers primarily to man’s attitude towards his personal god. The religious concept of man’s ‘personal god’, who guides him during his whole life and is responsible for his fate, emerged in the Old-Babylonian period in the 2nd millennium BC. |
topic |
Akkadian Assyriology history of religion mythology religious phenomenology Sumerian |
url |
http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liinaootsingluecke moistegishurtahendusestsumerijaakkadikirjanduslikesjarituaaltekstides |
_version_ |
1725309291220434944 |