Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides

The aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘desi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liina Ootsing-Lüecke
Format: Article
Language:Estonian
Published: Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum 2009-08-01
Series:Mäetagused
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdf
id doaj-d06af6fd551c44caac5060eb105135da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d06af6fd551c44caac5060eb105135da2020-11-25T00:35:17ZestEesti Kirjandusmuuseum Mäetagused1406-992X1406-99382009-08-0142123148Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstidesLiina Ootsing-LüeckeThe aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘design’), and the Akkadian word esē ru(m)(‘to draw’, ‘to design’, ‘drawing’, ‘design’ or ‘plan’) are mostly mentioned in a substantive context which encompasses the divine sphere. Gods and kings establish the world order with various ‘designs’ and ‘plans’.The Sumerian phenomenon of me (the ‘divine power’ of gods) which describes god’s essence and is a divine attribute, and the Akkadian term parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’) which encompasses divine ‘order’ and ‘cultic rites’, are both closely connected with the phenomena of ĝiš-hur and esē ru(m). In Sumerian and Akkadian myths and epics, the phrases ‘the plan of heaven and earth’ and ‘the cosmic order’ refer to the actions of gods and kings who always plan or design something substantial. A ‘plan’ is a means of securing power for a king. Gods also have ‘plans’ and ‘designs’ and deliver them to kings in an effort to strengthen and guarantee their reign. Kings have a duty to fulfil the ‘plan’ or ‘regulations’ of the land or kingdom. In Sumerian mythology the phenomenon of ĝiš-hur is connected with the underground aquifer abzu and its master, the god Enki. This understanding is also reflected in the late Babylonian epic of creation, which describes the establishing and securing the universal order. Sumerians and Akkadians also ‘designed’ and ‘drew’ many ‘temple’, ‘town’ and ‘kingdom’ plans, which had only local importance, but the loss of these plans is grieved about in several lamentation compositions. In later bilingual texts, abstract ‘cosmic’ and ‘life’ designs are mentioned. In Babylonian and Assyrian myths the creation of people is described as ‘drawing their shape’, and the same phrase is used in regard to the creation of other creatures and things. In Akkadian mythology the terms ‘plan’ and ‘design’ very often seem to be synonymous with parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’), which is administered by gods and kings. It can be lost in struggles for power and can therefore cause cosmic disorder and imbalance. In Sumerian and Akkadian incantations, primarily in apotropaic rites, the terms ‘magic circle’ or ‘drawing’ or ‘line’ describe a boundary that demons cannot cross. These ceremonial rites probably have a broader meaning: to avoid demons’ interference in the cosmic order which is under the control and patronage of gods. They set up ‘nets’ and ‘traps’ for evil ghosts who have crossed the magic border. The crafty god Enki/Ea mostly draws the magic circle: this phenomenon may be connected with the Sumerian perception about this god as a designer of temple plans.In Babylonian wisdom literature, the “gods’ rites” have already been interpreted from a moral perspective, which refers primarily to man’s attitude towards his personal god. The religious concept of man’s ‘personal god’, who guides him during his whole life and is responsible for his fate, emerged in the Old-Babylonian period in the 2nd millennium BC.http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdfAkkadianAssyriologyhistory of religionmythologyreligious phenomenologySumerian
collection DOAJ
language Estonian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liina Ootsing-Lüecke
spellingShingle Liina Ootsing-Lüecke
Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
Mäetagused
Akkadian
Assyriology
history of religion
mythology
religious phenomenology
Sumerian
author_facet Liina Ootsing-Lüecke
author_sort Liina Ootsing-Lüecke
title Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
title_short Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
title_full Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
title_fullStr Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
title_full_unstemmed Mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
title_sort mõiste giš-hur tähendusest sumeri ja akkadi kirjanduslikes ja rituaaltekstides
publisher Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum
series Mäetagused
issn 1406-992X
1406-9938
publishDate 2009-08-01
description The aim of this article is to interpret the meaning and concept of the word ‘plan’ or ‘drawing’ in Sumerian and Akkadian written sources and to give a brief summary of this phenomenon in Mesopotamia in the 3rd–1st millennium BC. The Sumerian word ĝiš-hur (lit. ‘wood scratch’, meaning ‘plan’ or ‘design’), and the Akkadian word esē ru(m)(‘to draw’, ‘to design’, ‘drawing’, ‘design’ or ‘plan’) are mostly mentioned in a substantive context which encompasses the divine sphere. Gods and kings establish the world order with various ‘designs’ and ‘plans’.The Sumerian phenomenon of me (the ‘divine power’ of gods) which describes god’s essence and is a divine attribute, and the Akkadian term parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’) which encompasses divine ‘order’ and ‘cultic rites’, are both closely connected with the phenomena of ĝiš-hur and esē ru(m). In Sumerian and Akkadian myths and epics, the phrases ‘the plan of heaven and earth’ and ‘the cosmic order’ refer to the actions of gods and kings who always plan or design something substantial. A ‘plan’ is a means of securing power for a king. Gods also have ‘plans’ and ‘designs’ and deliver them to kings in an effort to strengthen and guarantee their reign. Kings have a duty to fulfil the ‘plan’ or ‘regulations’ of the land or kingdom. In Sumerian mythology the phenomenon of ĝiš-hur is connected with the underground aquifer abzu and its master, the god Enki. This understanding is also reflected in the late Babylonian epic of creation, which describes the establishing and securing the universal order. Sumerians and Akkadians also ‘designed’ and ‘drew’ many ‘temple’, ‘town’ and ‘kingdom’ plans, which had only local importance, but the loss of these plans is grieved about in several lamentation compositions. In later bilingual texts, abstract ‘cosmic’ and ‘life’ designs are mentioned. In Babylonian and Assyrian myths the creation of people is described as ‘drawing their shape’, and the same phrase is used in regard to the creation of other creatures and things. In Akkadian mythology the terms ‘plan’ and ‘design’ very often seem to be synonymous with parsu(m) (‘cultic ordinance’), which is administered by gods and kings. It can be lost in struggles for power and can therefore cause cosmic disorder and imbalance. In Sumerian and Akkadian incantations, primarily in apotropaic rites, the terms ‘magic circle’ or ‘drawing’ or ‘line’ describe a boundary that demons cannot cross. These ceremonial rites probably have a broader meaning: to avoid demons’ interference in the cosmic order which is under the control and patronage of gods. They set up ‘nets’ and ‘traps’ for evil ghosts who have crossed the magic border. The crafty god Enki/Ea mostly draws the magic circle: this phenomenon may be connected with the Sumerian perception about this god as a designer of temple plans.In Babylonian wisdom literature, the “gods’ rites” have already been interpreted from a moral perspective, which refers primarily to man’s attitude towards his personal god. The religious concept of man’s ‘personal god’, who guides him during his whole life and is responsible for his fate, emerged in the Old-Babylonian period in the 2nd millennium BC.
topic Akkadian
Assyriology
history of religion
mythology
religious phenomenology
Sumerian
url http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr42/ootsing_lyecke.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT liinaootsingluecke moistegishurtahendusestsumerijaakkadikirjanduslikesjarituaaltekstides
_version_ 1725309291220434944