Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique

Abstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satoshi Shioiri, Kazumichi Matsumiya, Chia-huei Tseng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2
id doaj-d05546f188c24a41aea0f2f1f0177711
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d05546f188c24a41aea0f2f1f01777112021-02-21T12:32:38ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111710.1038/s41598-021-82900-2Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE techniqueSatoshi Shioiri0Kazumichi Matsumiya1Chia-huei Tseng2Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku UniversityDepartment of Applied Information Sciences, Tohoku UniversityResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku UniversityAbstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-temporal frequency. We examined their respective responses to global motion after adapting to a global motion pattern constructed of multiple compound Gabor patches arranged circularly. Each compound Gabor patch contained two gratings at different spatial frequencies (0.53 and 2.13 cpd) drifting in opposite directions. The participants reported the direction and duration of the MAE for a variety of global motion patterns. We discovered that static MAE durations depended on the global motion patterns, e.g., longer MAE duration to patches arranged to see rotation than to random motion (Exp 1), and increase with global motion strength (patch number in Exp 2). In contrast, flicker MAEs durations are similar across different patterns and adaptation strength. Further, the global integration occurred at the adaptation stage, rather than at the test stage (Exp 3). These results suggest that slow motion mechanism, assessed by static MAE, integrate motion signals over space while fast motion mechanisms do not, at least under the conditions used.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Satoshi Shioiri
Kazumichi Matsumiya
Chia-huei Tseng
spellingShingle Satoshi Shioiri
Kazumichi Matsumiya
Chia-huei Tseng
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
Scientific Reports
author_facet Satoshi Shioiri
Kazumichi Matsumiya
Chia-huei Tseng
author_sort Satoshi Shioiri
title Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
title_short Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
title_full Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
title_fullStr Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
title_sort contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an mae technique
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-temporal frequency. We examined their respective responses to global motion after adapting to a global motion pattern constructed of multiple compound Gabor patches arranged circularly. Each compound Gabor patch contained two gratings at different spatial frequencies (0.53 and 2.13 cpd) drifting in opposite directions. The participants reported the direction and duration of the MAE for a variety of global motion patterns. We discovered that static MAE durations depended on the global motion patterns, e.g., longer MAE duration to patches arranged to see rotation than to random motion (Exp 1), and increase with global motion strength (patch number in Exp 2). In contrast, flicker MAEs durations are similar across different patterns and adaptation strength. Further, the global integration occurred at the adaptation stage, rather than at the test stage (Exp 3). These results suggest that slow motion mechanism, assessed by static MAE, integrate motion signals over space while fast motion mechanisms do not, at least under the conditions used.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2
work_keys_str_mv AT satoshishioiri contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique
AT kazumichimatsumiya contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique
AT chiahueitseng contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique
_version_ 1724257969708728320