Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
Abstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-te...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2 |
id |
doaj-d05546f188c24a41aea0f2f1f0177711 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-d05546f188c24a41aea0f2f1f01777112021-02-21T12:32:38ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111710.1038/s41598-021-82900-2Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE techniqueSatoshi Shioiri0Kazumichi Matsumiya1Chia-huei Tseng2Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku UniversityDepartment of Applied Information Sciences, Tohoku UniversityResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku UniversityAbstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-temporal frequency. We examined their respective responses to global motion after adapting to a global motion pattern constructed of multiple compound Gabor patches arranged circularly. Each compound Gabor patch contained two gratings at different spatial frequencies (0.53 and 2.13 cpd) drifting in opposite directions. The participants reported the direction and duration of the MAE for a variety of global motion patterns. We discovered that static MAE durations depended on the global motion patterns, e.g., longer MAE duration to patches arranged to see rotation than to random motion (Exp 1), and increase with global motion strength (patch number in Exp 2). In contrast, flicker MAEs durations are similar across different patterns and adaptation strength. Further, the global integration occurred at the adaptation stage, rather than at the test stage (Exp 3). These results suggest that slow motion mechanism, assessed by static MAE, integrate motion signals over space while fast motion mechanisms do not, at least under the conditions used.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Satoshi Shioiri Kazumichi Matsumiya Chia-huei Tseng |
spellingShingle |
Satoshi Shioiri Kazumichi Matsumiya Chia-huei Tseng Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Satoshi Shioiri Kazumichi Matsumiya Chia-huei Tseng |
author_sort |
Satoshi Shioiri |
title |
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique |
title_short |
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique |
title_full |
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique |
title_fullStr |
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique |
title_sort |
contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an mae technique |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-temporal frequency. We examined their respective responses to global motion after adapting to a global motion pattern constructed of multiple compound Gabor patches arranged circularly. Each compound Gabor patch contained two gratings at different spatial frequencies (0.53 and 2.13 cpd) drifting in opposite directions. The participants reported the direction and duration of the MAE for a variety of global motion patterns. We discovered that static MAE durations depended on the global motion patterns, e.g., longer MAE duration to patches arranged to see rotation than to random motion (Exp 1), and increase with global motion strength (patch number in Exp 2). In contrast, flicker MAEs durations are similar across different patterns and adaptation strength. Further, the global integration occurred at the adaptation stage, rather than at the test stage (Exp 3). These results suggest that slow motion mechanism, assessed by static MAE, integrate motion signals over space while fast motion mechanisms do not, at least under the conditions used. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT satoshishioiri contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique AT kazumichimatsumiya contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique AT chiahueitseng contributionoftheslowmotionmechanismtoglobalmotionrevealedbyanmaetechnique |
_version_ |
1724257969708728320 |