A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica

We provide a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station (RMBS), Costa Rica. During a period of a year (2012–2013) we conducted visual and acoustic surveys in a natural mature forest plot (>50 years old) (MF), secondary forest plot (~17 years old) (SF), in ope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Víctor Acosta-Chaves, Gerardo Chaves, Juan Abarca, Adrián García-Rodríguez, Federico Bolaños
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2015-11-01
Series:Check List
Online Access:https://checklist.pensoft.net/article/19386/download/pdf/
id doaj-d045d13c22ba4f32ba974e6a7e3f6db5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d045d13c22ba4f32ba974e6a7e3f6db52021-05-21T15:20:39ZengPensoft PublishersCheck List1809-127X2015-11-0111611010.15560/11.6.178419386A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa RicaVíctor Acosta-Chaves0Gerardo Chaves1Juan Abarca2Adrián García-Rodríguez3Federico Bolaños4Universidad de Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa RicaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte/Universidad de Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa RicaWe provide a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station (RMBS), Costa Rica. During a period of a year (2012–2013) we conducted visual and acoustic surveys in a natural mature forest plot (>50 years old) (MF), secondary forest plot (~17 years old) (SF), in open areas and riparian forest at RMBS. We found a total of 11 species of amphibians and 15 species of reptiles belonging to 11 taxonomic families. We also compared the diversity of the MF against the SF. The MF contained 10 species (five amphibians and five reptiles) and the SF seven (three amphibians and four reptiles), with similar dominance between sites. Unfortunately, some forest and riparian species have vanished at this elevation after an enigmatic decline; according to historical literature pristine areas should contain higher species richness. Perhaps, the secondary forest will provide an available habitat for an important percentage of the remaining forest species.https://checklist.pensoft.net/article/19386/download/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Víctor Acosta-Chaves
Gerardo Chaves
Juan Abarca
Adrián García-Rodríguez
Federico Bolaños
spellingShingle Víctor Acosta-Chaves
Gerardo Chaves
Juan Abarca
Adrián García-Rodríguez
Federico Bolaños
A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
Check List
author_facet Víctor Acosta-Chaves
Gerardo Chaves
Juan Abarca
Adrián García-Rodríguez
Federico Bolaños
author_sort Víctor Acosta-Chaves
title A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
title_short A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
title_full A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
title_fullStr A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
title_full_unstemmed A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station, Provincia de Cartago, Costa Rica
title_sort checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of río macho biological station, provincia de cartago, costa rica
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Check List
issn 1809-127X
publishDate 2015-11-01
description We provide a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Río Macho Biological Station (RMBS), Costa Rica. During a period of a year (2012–2013) we conducted visual and acoustic surveys in a natural mature forest plot (>50 years old) (MF), secondary forest plot (~17 years old) (SF), in open areas and riparian forest at RMBS. We found a total of 11 species of amphibians and 15 species of reptiles belonging to 11 taxonomic families. We also compared the diversity of the MF against the SF. The MF contained 10 species (five amphibians and five reptiles) and the SF seven (three amphibians and four reptiles), with similar dominance between sites. Unfortunately, some forest and riparian species have vanished at this elevation after an enigmatic decline; according to historical literature pristine areas should contain higher species richness. Perhaps, the secondary forest will provide an available habitat for an important percentage of the remaining forest species.
url https://checklist.pensoft.net/article/19386/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT victoracostachaves achecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT gerardochaves achecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT juanabarca achecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT adriangarciarodriguez achecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT federicobolanos achecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT victoracostachaves checklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT gerardochaves checklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT juanabarca checklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT adriangarciarodriguez checklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
AT federicobolanos checklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofriomachobiologicalstationprovinciadecartagocostarica
_version_ 1721431549677666304