A comparative cadaveric biomechanical analysis of the differences between dynamic external traction devices for PIP joint fracture dislocation.
Purpose: No study in the literature compares different external distractors for PIPJ injury. We compared a device described by Suzuki et al and another by Hynes & Giddins in non-injured cadaveric fingers. Main outcome measures were articular space and PIPJ flexion resistance. Methods: Thirty-t...
Main Authors: | Stephanie Thibaudeau, Julian Diaz-Abele, Mario Luc |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
McGill University
2020-07-01
|
Series: | McGill Journal of Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://mjm.mcgill.ca/article/view/89 |
Similar Items
-
Odontoid process fractures: the role of the ligaments in maintaining stability. A biomechanical, cadaveric study
by: Boughton Oliver Richard, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
The professionalism and medical ethics education through cadaveric dissection
by: arezo farajpor, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Installing Python Modules with pip
by: Fred Gibbs
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Lumbar mechanical traction: a biomechanical assessment of change at the lumbar spine
by: Shigeru Tadano, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Segregation of PIP2 and PIP3 into distinct nanoscale regions within the plasma membrane
by: Jie Wang, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)