From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC

Real estate- and property owners’ rationales behind the adoption of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) respectively how LCC is actually used in renovation projects, is investigated through empirical data from a questionnaire survey sent to managers in Swedish real estate organisations. The study shows a posi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pernilla Gluch, Mathias Gustafsson, Henrikke Baumann, Göran Lindahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2018-05-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/1544
id doaj-d03e39b96a9f4ac8b0323833c9a853e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d03e39b96a9f4ac8b0323833c9a853e22021-07-02T05:57:24ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792018-05-0122310.3846/ijspm.2018.1544From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCCPernilla Gluch0Mathias Gustafsson1Henrikke Baumann2Göran Lindahl3Division of Service Management and Logistics, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenDivision of Construction Management, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenDivision of Environmental Systems Analysis, Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, SwedenDivision of Construction Management, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden Real estate- and property owners’ rationales behind the adoption of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) respectively how LCC is actually used in renovation projects, is investigated through empirical data from a questionnaire survey sent to managers in Swedish real estate organisations. The study shows a positive attitude towards LCC. It is perceived to as a flexible and multi-functional tool with a familiar monetary format. Nevertheless, the study also reveals simplistic and undevel-oped views of how to use LCC. While much research has focused on developing sophisticated LCC tools, the findings indicate that practitioners’ interest in these refinements seems limited. The importance of understanding that LCC is used in a context of multiple and partly competing institutional logics of renovation is emphasised. The paper contributes to a more informed research in development of LCC tools as well as better informed LCC use among real estate and property owners. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/1544Life cycle costing (LCC)project managementproperty managementrenovationreal estatequestionnaire
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pernilla Gluch
Mathias Gustafsson
Henrikke Baumann
Göran Lindahl
spellingShingle Pernilla Gluch
Mathias Gustafsson
Henrikke Baumann
Göran Lindahl
From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Life cycle costing (LCC)
project management
property management
renovation
real estate
questionnaire
author_facet Pernilla Gluch
Mathias Gustafsson
Henrikke Baumann
Göran Lindahl
author_sort Pernilla Gluch
title From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
title_short From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
title_full From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
title_fullStr From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
title_full_unstemmed From tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of LCC
title_sort from tool-making to tool-using – and back: rationales for adoption and use of lcc
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Real estate- and property owners’ rationales behind the adoption of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) respectively how LCC is actually used in renovation projects, is investigated through empirical data from a questionnaire survey sent to managers in Swedish real estate organisations. The study shows a positive attitude towards LCC. It is perceived to as a flexible and multi-functional tool with a familiar monetary format. Nevertheless, the study also reveals simplistic and undevel-oped views of how to use LCC. While much research has focused on developing sophisticated LCC tools, the findings indicate that practitioners’ interest in these refinements seems limited. The importance of understanding that LCC is used in a context of multiple and partly competing institutional logics of renovation is emphasised. The paper contributes to a more informed research in development of LCC tools as well as better informed LCC use among real estate and property owners.
topic Life cycle costing (LCC)
project management
property management
renovation
real estate
questionnaire
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/1544
work_keys_str_mv AT pernillagluch fromtoolmakingtotoolusingandbackrationalesforadoptionanduseoflcc
AT mathiasgustafsson fromtoolmakingtotoolusingandbackrationalesforadoptionanduseoflcc
AT henrikkebaumann fromtoolmakingtotoolusingandbackrationalesforadoptionanduseoflcc
AT goranlindahl fromtoolmakingtotoolusingandbackrationalesforadoptionanduseoflcc
_version_ 1721337981739991040