FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model

Introduction: Fractional CO2 lasers have been used to improve scar properties following burn injury; however, the efficacy of laser therapy alone has been difficult to ascertain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of fractional CO2 laser therapy on objectively measured scar outcomes i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Molly E. Baumann, Isabelle A. Clairmonte, Danielle M. DeBruler, Britani N. Blackstone, Megan M. Malara, Dorothy M. Supp, J. Kevin Bailey, Heather M. Powell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Burns Open
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912219300240
id doaj-d0200c562aea45b4badb40e11230ae0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-d0200c562aea45b4badb40e11230ae0e2020-11-25T01:10:28ZengElsevierBurns Open2468-91222019-07-01338995FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine modelMolly E. Baumann0Isabelle A. Clairmonte1Danielle M. DeBruler2Britani N. Blackstone3Megan M. Malara4Dorothy M. Supp5J. Kevin Bailey6Heather M. Powell7Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 270 Bevis Hall, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 270 Bevis Hall, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 177 Watts Hall, 2041 N. College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 177 Watts Hall, 2041 N. College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 177 Watts Hall, 2041 N. College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesResearch Department, Shriners Hospitals for Children – Cincinnati, 3229 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3230 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267, United StatesDepartment of Surgery and Division of Critical Care, Trauma and Burns, The Ohio State University, 410 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 270 Bevis Hall, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 177 Watts Hall, 2041 N. College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Research Department, Shriners Hospitals for Children – Cincinnati, 3229 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, United States; Corresponding author at: The Ohio State University, 346 MacQuigg Lab, 2041 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.Introduction: Fractional CO2 lasers have been used to improve scar properties following burn injury; however, the efficacy of laser therapy alone has been difficult to ascertain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of fractional CO2 laser therapy on objectively measured scar outcomes including scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and biomechanics in a porcine burn model. Methods: Full thickness burn wounds were created on female red Duroc pigs; burn eschar was excised and wounds were grafted with split-thickness autograft. Sites had no additional treatment for 105 days resulting in thick contracted scars. At 105 days post burn, scars were treated with either a single pulse or three stacked pulses of a fractional CO2 laser at 70 mJ. Three treatments were given at four-week intervals. Scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and mechanics were evaluated before treatment and at days 133, 161 and 189 post-injury. Results: Neither single nor stacked laser treatment resulted in a significant improvement in scar area, appearance, or biomechanics compared to control scars. Scar roughness was, on average, reduced with fractional CO2 treatment; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Although many clinical studies have reported significant benefits when treating burn scars with fractional CO2 laser therapy, this study did not find significant differences following laser therapy. For greatest efficacy, the selection of laser delivery parameters and co-treatments must account for variability in scar properties, including thickness. Keywords: Burn, Scar, Fractional CO2 laser, Quantitative analyseshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912219300240
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Molly E. Baumann
Isabelle A. Clairmonte
Danielle M. DeBruler
Britani N. Blackstone
Megan M. Malara
Dorothy M. Supp
J. Kevin Bailey
Heather M. Powell
spellingShingle Molly E. Baumann
Isabelle A. Clairmonte
Danielle M. DeBruler
Britani N. Blackstone
Megan M. Malara
Dorothy M. Supp
J. Kevin Bailey
Heather M. Powell
FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
Burns Open
author_facet Molly E. Baumann
Isabelle A. Clairmonte
Danielle M. DeBruler
Britani N. Blackstone
Megan M. Malara
Dorothy M. Supp
J. Kevin Bailey
Heather M. Powell
author_sort Molly E. Baumann
title FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
title_short FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
title_full FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
title_fullStr FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed FXCO2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
title_sort fxco2 laser therapy of existing burn scars does not significantly improve outcomes in a porcine model
publisher Elsevier
series Burns Open
issn 2468-9122
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Introduction: Fractional CO2 lasers have been used to improve scar properties following burn injury; however, the efficacy of laser therapy alone has been difficult to ascertain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of fractional CO2 laser therapy on objectively measured scar outcomes including scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and biomechanics in a porcine burn model. Methods: Full thickness burn wounds were created on female red Duroc pigs; burn eschar was excised and wounds were grafted with split-thickness autograft. Sites had no additional treatment for 105 days resulting in thick contracted scars. At 105 days post burn, scars were treated with either a single pulse or three stacked pulses of a fractional CO2 laser at 70 mJ. Three treatments were given at four-week intervals. Scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and mechanics were evaluated before treatment and at days 133, 161 and 189 post-injury. Results: Neither single nor stacked laser treatment resulted in a significant improvement in scar area, appearance, or biomechanics compared to control scars. Scar roughness was, on average, reduced with fractional CO2 treatment; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Although many clinical studies have reported significant benefits when treating burn scars with fractional CO2 laser therapy, this study did not find significant differences following laser therapy. For greatest efficacy, the selection of laser delivery parameters and co-treatments must account for variability in scar properties, including thickness. Keywords: Burn, Scar, Fractional CO2 laser, Quantitative analyses
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912219300240
work_keys_str_mv AT mollyebaumann fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT isabelleaclairmonte fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT daniellemdebruler fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT britaninblackstone fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT meganmmalara fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT dorothymsupp fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT jkevinbailey fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
AT heathermpowell fxco2lasertherapyofexistingburnscarsdoesnotsignificantlyimproveoutcomesinaporcinemodel
_version_ 1725174547170197504