Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses

Mugbook searches are conducted in case a suspect is not known and to assess if a previously convicted person might be recognized as a potential culprit. The goal of the two experiments reported here was to analyze if prior statements and information about the suspect can aid in the evaluation if suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Handler, Sascha Frühholz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675956/full
id doaj-cffd39a29388400dac90610ed2316d30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cffd39a29388400dac90610ed2316d302021-08-13T14:10:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-08-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.675956675956Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of WitnessesAlexander Handler0Sascha Frühholz1Sascha Frühholz2Sascha Frühholz3Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNeuroscience Center Zurich, ETH Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayMugbook searches are conducted in case a suspect is not known and to assess if a previously convicted person might be recognized as a potential culprit. The goal of the two experiments reported here was to analyze if prior statements and information about the suspect can aid in the evaluation if such a mugbook search is subsequently advised or not. In experiment 1, memory accuracy for person descriptors was tested in order to analyze, which attributes could be chosen to down-scale the mugbook prior to testing. Results showed that age was the most accurate descriptor, followed by ethnicity and height. At the same time self-assessed low subjective accuracy of culprit descriptions by the witness seemed to be divergent to the objective actual performance accuracy. In experiment 2, a mugbook search was conducted after participants viewed a video of a staged crime and gave a description of the culprit. Results showed that accuracy in mugbook searches correlated positively with the total number of person descriptors given by the witness as well as with witness’ description of external facial features. Predictive confidence (i.e., subjective rating of own performance in the subsequent mugbook search), however did not show any relation to the identification accuracy in the actual mugbook search. These results highlight the notion that mugbooks should not be conducted according to the subjective estimation of the witness’ performance but more according to the actual statements and descriptions that the witness can give about the culprit.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675956/fullmugbookeyewitness identificationperson descriptionperson recognitionmemory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Handler
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
spellingShingle Alexander Handler
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
Frontiers in Psychology
mugbook
eyewitness identification
person description
person recognition
memory
author_facet Alexander Handler
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
Sascha Frühholz
author_sort Alexander Handler
title Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
title_short Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
title_full Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
title_fullStr Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
title_full_unstemmed Eyewitness Memory for Person Identification: Predicting Mugbook Recognition Accuracy According to Person Description Abilities and Subjective Confidence of Witnesses
title_sort eyewitness memory for person identification: predicting mugbook recognition accuracy according to person description abilities and subjective confidence of witnesses
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Mugbook searches are conducted in case a suspect is not known and to assess if a previously convicted person might be recognized as a potential culprit. The goal of the two experiments reported here was to analyze if prior statements and information about the suspect can aid in the evaluation if such a mugbook search is subsequently advised or not. In experiment 1, memory accuracy for person descriptors was tested in order to analyze, which attributes could be chosen to down-scale the mugbook prior to testing. Results showed that age was the most accurate descriptor, followed by ethnicity and height. At the same time self-assessed low subjective accuracy of culprit descriptions by the witness seemed to be divergent to the objective actual performance accuracy. In experiment 2, a mugbook search was conducted after participants viewed a video of a staged crime and gave a description of the culprit. Results showed that accuracy in mugbook searches correlated positively with the total number of person descriptors given by the witness as well as with witness’ description of external facial features. Predictive confidence (i.e., subjective rating of own performance in the subsequent mugbook search), however did not show any relation to the identification accuracy in the actual mugbook search. These results highlight the notion that mugbooks should not be conducted according to the subjective estimation of the witness’ performance but more according to the actual statements and descriptions that the witness can give about the culprit.
topic mugbook
eyewitness identification
person description
person recognition
memory
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675956/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderhandler eyewitnessmemoryforpersonidentificationpredictingmugbookrecognitionaccuracyaccordingtopersondescriptionabilitiesandsubjectiveconfidenceofwitnesses
AT saschafruhholz eyewitnessmemoryforpersonidentificationpredictingmugbookrecognitionaccuracyaccordingtopersondescriptionabilitiesandsubjectiveconfidenceofwitnesses
AT saschafruhholz eyewitnessmemoryforpersonidentificationpredictingmugbookrecognitionaccuracyaccordingtopersondescriptionabilitiesandsubjectiveconfidenceofwitnesses
AT saschafruhholz eyewitnessmemoryforpersonidentificationpredictingmugbookrecognitionaccuracyaccordingtopersondescriptionabilitiesandsubjectiveconfidenceofwitnesses
_version_ 1721208363972296704