LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?
Goal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in au...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914 |
id |
doaj-cff648b5c2ab464084c0c366deba6730 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cff648b5c2ab464084c0c366deba67302020-11-25T02:37:25ZengUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaCakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan0216-13702442-86202019-10-0138359060010.21831/cp.v38i3.2691412206LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY?Sugiman Sugiman0Endah Retnowati1Paul Ayres2Murdanu Murdanu3(Scopus ID: 57204035834) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversity of New South WalesUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaGoal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in authentic mathematics classrooms employing a factorial design with 2 problem presentations (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) ´ 2 learning environments (collaboratively vs. individually) using a Geometry topic. This consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, acquisition, near and far transfer tests. 111 seventh graders (Average: 12.8 y.o.) who were novices, participated voluntary. The findings showed that students who learned by goal-free problems had significantly higher far-transfer scores than when the goal was given. Interestingly, in the acquisition phase, the students in goal-free problems experienced significantly higher cognitive load than their counterparts. Further, it was found that overall, individuals scored significantly higher in a far-transfer test than those who learned collaboratively; however, during the acquisition phase individuals experienced significantly higher cognitive load than collaborative learning. No pattern of interaction effects was indicated. Overall, it was concluded that goal-free problems may be learned either collaborativelly or individually. Nevertheless, the goal-free problems stimulated higher cognitive load during learning, which seemed to have a positive influence.https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914goal-free problemscognitive loadcollaborativemathematics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sugiman Sugiman Endah Retnowati Paul Ayres Murdanu Murdanu |
spellingShingle |
Sugiman Sugiman Endah Retnowati Paul Ayres Murdanu Murdanu LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan goal-free problems cognitive load collaborative mathematics |
author_facet |
Sugiman Sugiman Endah Retnowati Paul Ayres Murdanu Murdanu |
author_sort |
Sugiman Sugiman |
title |
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? |
title_short |
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? |
title_full |
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? |
title_fullStr |
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? |
title_full_unstemmed |
LEARNING GOAL-FREE PROBLEMS: COLLABORATIVELY OR INDIVIDUALLY? |
title_sort |
learning goal-free problems: collaboratively or individually? |
publisher |
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta |
series |
Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan |
issn |
0216-1370 2442-8620 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Goal-free is a learning strategy to present a problem without specific questions, in contrary to a goal-given problem. This research examined the goal-free effects during mathematics collaborative learning measured by cognitive load ratings and transfer performance. An experiment was conducted in authentic mathematics classrooms employing a factorial design with 2 problem presentations (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) ´ 2 learning environments (collaboratively vs. individually) using a Geometry topic. This consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, acquisition, near and far transfer tests. 111 seventh graders (Average: 12.8 y.o.) who were novices, participated voluntary. The findings showed that students who learned by goal-free problems had significantly higher far-transfer scores than when the goal was given. Interestingly, in the acquisition phase, the students in goal-free problems experienced significantly higher cognitive load than their counterparts. Further, it was found that overall, individuals scored significantly higher in a far-transfer test than those who learned collaboratively; however, during the acquisition phase individuals experienced significantly higher cognitive load than collaborative learning. No pattern of interaction effects was indicated. Overall, it was concluded that goal-free problems may be learned either collaborativelly or individually. Nevertheless, the goal-free problems stimulated higher cognitive load during learning, which seemed to have a positive influence. |
topic |
goal-free problems cognitive load collaborative mathematics |
url |
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/26914 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sugimansugiman learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually AT endahretnowati learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually AT paulayres learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually AT murdanumurdanu learninggoalfreeproblemscollaborativelyorindividually |
_version_ |
1724795737650233344 |