The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
Abstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alte...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-cff3b034f7c7421aa4b4916f4e447338 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cff3b034f7c7421aa4b4916f4e4473382020-11-25T01:33:59ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Relações InternacionaisRevista Brasileira de Política Internacional1983-31212018-12-0161210.1590/0034-7329201800208S0034-73292018000200206The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s EraJosé Antonio Sanchez RomanAbstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=enU.S. liberal internationalismGood Neighbor Policyinternational orderdevelopment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
José Antonio Sanchez Roman |
spellingShingle |
José Antonio Sanchez Roman The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional U.S. liberal internationalism Good Neighbor Policy international order development |
author_facet |
José Antonio Sanchez Roman |
author_sort |
José Antonio Sanchez Roman |
title |
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era |
title_short |
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era |
title_full |
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era |
title_fullStr |
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era |
title_full_unstemmed |
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era |
title_sort |
challenge from the periphery: latin america’s new deals and the shaping of liberal internationalism in fdr’s era |
publisher |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional |
issn |
1983-3121 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Abstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order. |
topic |
U.S. liberal internationalism Good Neighbor Policy international order development |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joseantoniosanchezroman thechallengefromtheperipherylatinamericasnewdealsandtheshapingofliberalinternationalisminfdrsera AT joseantoniosanchezroman challengefromtheperipherylatinamericasnewdealsandtheshapingofliberalinternationalisminfdrsera |
_version_ |
1725074429069754368 |