The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era

Abstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: José Antonio Sanchez Roman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais 2018-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-cff3b034f7c7421aa4b4916f4e447338
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cff3b034f7c7421aa4b4916f4e4473382020-11-25T01:33:59ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Relações InternacionaisRevista Brasileira de Política Internacional1983-31212018-12-0161210.1590/0034-7329201800208S0034-73292018000200206The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s EraJosé Antonio Sanchez RomanAbstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=enU.S. liberal internationalismGood Neighbor Policyinternational orderdevelopment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Antonio Sanchez Roman
spellingShingle José Antonio Sanchez Roman
The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
U.S. liberal internationalism
Good Neighbor Policy
international order
development
author_facet José Antonio Sanchez Roman
author_sort José Antonio Sanchez Roman
title The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
title_short The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
title_full The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
title_fullStr The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
title_full_unstemmed The challenge from the periphery: Latin America’s New Deals and the shaping of Liberal Internationalism in FDR’s Era
title_sort challenge from the periphery: latin america’s new deals and the shaping of liberal internationalism in fdr’s era
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais
series Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional
issn 1983-3121
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract FDR’s policies, in particular the New Deal, became a sort of global brand, and created a transnational space of discussion. Many in the periphery, in particular in Latin America, appropriated the notion and labeled their own proposals as their own New Deals. These proposals produced an alternative international cooperative order, not necessarily the one wished by American elites. Latin America’s appropriation and reinterpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s message stirred controversies and disputes in the United States, within the liberal internationalist sectors, both in political positions and private actors. This article explores the reaction of certain U.S. liberal elites to the way Latin Americans appropriated and shaped international Rooseveltian ideas. It argues that some American internationalist elites feared that the way in which Latin Americans understood the New Deal and the Good Neighbor Policy might push development ideas abroad beyond the pale, as it might encourage the more radical stance of FDR administration at home, and it might jeopardize an American-led reorganization of the international order.
topic U.S. liberal internationalism
Good Neighbor Policy
international order
development
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000200206&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT joseantoniosanchezroman thechallengefromtheperipherylatinamericasnewdealsandtheshapingofliberalinternationalisminfdrsera
AT joseantoniosanchezroman challengefromtheperipherylatinamericasnewdealsandtheshapingofliberalinternationalisminfdrsera
_version_ 1725074429069754368